In reply to Vibrator !'s message of Thu, 31 May 2018 18:27:36 +0100: Hi, If you are not a troll, then put it on a web page, and post a link here. Also take your prototype and measuring equipment to your local university or college and demonstrate it to a physics Prof....or do you only have the sims?
>I've found Bessler's gain principle. The energy density's obviously >'infinite', and power density's limited only by material constraints. > >A propulsion application is also implied, but not yet tested. > >I've put together some WM2D sims, independently metering all component >variables of the input / output energy, for cross-referencing consistency - >no stone is left unturned, and there are no gaps. All values have also >been checked with manual calcs. The results are incontrovertible - this is >neither mistake, nor psychosis. > > > >It's been a week since achieving certainty, yet all i've done in that time >is stare in disbelief at the results. > >Yet it's no 'happy accident' either - i worked out the solution from first >principles, then put together a mechanism that does what the maths do, >confirming the theory. > >I'm understandably even more incredulous at the implications of the CoM >violation than the CoE one, yet the latter's entirely dependent upon the >former. Both are being empirically measured, in a direct causal >relationship. > > >This absolutely demands immediate wider attention. > > >But who in their right mind would even look at it? How do i bring it to >the attentions of the 'right' people - the ones that need to know about it, >and who can join in the R&D - without resorting to futile crank-emails to >universities and govt. departments etc.? > >I've wasted a week, so far. Too long, already. > > >Pretty much blinded in the headlights here.. i could sorely do with making >a few bob off it, but at the same time it's too important to sit on - so >how to reconcile these conflicting priorities? > >I'd like to post up the sims here, or at least provide a link to them, just >to share the findings with ANYONE able to comprehend them... it's just >classical mechanics (or at least, the parts that can actually be measured) >- force, mass and motion. The absolute basics. Simply no room for error >or ambiguity. Unequivocal 'free' energy; currently around 190% of unity. >You definitely want to see this, and i desperately want to share it. > >What should i do though? How does one proceed, in this kind of situation? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success
