Neutral muons may act like neutrons and be absorbed to cause a reaction with 
additional neutral muons and/or charged muons.
A local source of charged muons, which are known to induce D fusion and maybe H 
fusion to D.

Bob Cook
________________________________
From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 12:19:18 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Zimmerman's piece could be scarier than we can imagine



From: Axil Axil<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>


  *   I can not see how the Bose Condensation nature of ultra dense material 
can support a chain reaction. The Condensate offloads its excess energy through 
the production of muons not neutrons. Muons are not bad like neutrons. Muons do 
not pump the Condensate, so there is no positive feedback loop possible

There are alternative scenarios for a feedback loop. One of the possibilities 
does not involve uranium at all. Another would simply happen so rapidly that 
most of the UDD is converted into helium before it can change state. Since 
Holmlid does see some fusion, in addition to muons, it is likely that the 
fusion part of the reaction could be optimized.

If we accept that 105Pd is the active isotope of cold fusion - and that it is 
converted into 107Ag in the main cold fusion reaction, which is one 
interpretation of the recent Biberian finding (which triggered this posting to 
begin with) then UDD is going to be gainful without being annihilated and 
without the need of a laser.

Also, imagine a large caliber bullet composed of fully loaded PdD. If a 
spherical array of barrels is arranged around a depleted U core, what happens 
when the core implodes? (given that we know that muons are preferentially 
absorbed by U)

Anyway, a hypothetical UDD explanation could combine Holmlid’s species with 
P&F’s palladium lattice – so it would be a hybrid - and is open to criticism on 
that account. The underlying fusion reaction should produce at least 14 MeV. If 
engineered properly there would be chain reaction of sorts (positive feedback 
from pressure, for sure) which is dependent on the initial inventory of UDD. 
The yield could be one fourth as much as uranium fission.

Given how much the USA is hated in parts of the middle East, and how much 
wealth there is - any of these nightmares becomes simply a matter of will and 
can be countered by careful planning. We can only hope that our government is 
taking the proper precautions. OTOH, a simple “dirty bomb” is devastating 
enough and it can be argued that it will be the first thing which is tried.

It does not help to hide one’s head in the sand and opine that we should not 
even discuss the possibilities. The easiest way for enemies of the US to 
succeed is for experts (or even those on the fringe) not to be vocal and  aware 
of what technology is available and how it can be used.

If UDD is real, then it may not be presently taken into account by those who 
should be looking at all the risks.





Reply via email to