neutron detectors in the antarctic ice sheet should read
neutrino detectors in the antarctic ice sheet On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 4:44 PM Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > No, I stated 1 million GeV correctly. > > See > http://restframe.com/downloads/tachyon_monopoles.pdf > > I beleive what Keith Fredericks is seeing is an analoge tackyon as > characterized as a quasiparticle. It is actually a molecule of ultra dense > matter that can host a superconductive condensate of polaritons. > > This quasiparticle is a monopole and can store a huge amount of energy. > > Many seemingly impossible observations in science might be explained by > LENR. Here is one that might be one that could be explained by this > monopole quasiparticle. > > > https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/09/oddball-particles-tunneling-through-earth-could-point-new-physics > > Oddball particles tunneling through Earth could point to new physics > By Adrian Cho Sep. 27, 2018 > > Are these ultra high energy particles being produced by the LENR reaction > on the surface or just inside the earth? > > We might consider that these high energy particle bursts are coming from > the surface of the earth or just inside it. Only particle reactions > involving ultra dense matter might store enough power to generate these > powerful and yet unexplained particle showers. > > The reference article estimates that the energy produced in the particle > shower. > > However, the showers’ large sizes show that the particles must have had > energies in excess of 0.5 exa-electron volts—70,000 times higher than the > energy achieved with the most powerful particle accelerator. > > This amount of energy released as stated in the article is 10^18 ev. A > million GeV would come to 10^15 Ev. This large amount of energy release > needs to be explained in terms of possible LENR reactions. This large > amount of energy store might be explained in terms of the energy content > released in the tracks of strange radiation that has been detected in > numerous LENR experiments. > > Keith Fredericks has calculated the energy released by monopole based > strange radiation that Keith has produced and also by other researchers > included in the studies of Urutskoev, et.al, Ivoilov, Rodionov and > Savvatimova, Priem et.al and Bardout et.al, Lochak, and Adamenko and > Vysotskii. More recently, this type of particle track has also been seen by > both MFMP and LION. LION has posted that he has seen a macro sized particle > visible with his unaided eyes as a black body moving across a bright nickel > surface. The more energy that these quaiparticles store, the bigger they > get. And the really big ones can be seen with the unaided eyes. > > > Using the photographic analysis method that Keith Fredericks explains in > his paper as referenced above, Keith estimates the tracks were produced by > a strange particle whose energy content reached the maximum energy > (m'(eV/c2)) listed in table 7 of 4.6 x 10^15 electron volts. > > Keith Fredericks also states that strange particles have been detected in > entangled bundles of many identically moving particles. The total energy > content of these particle bundles is simply the sum of the individual > energy content of each of these particles that are members of the entangled > bundle aggregation. > > To reach 10^18 ev, an entangled particle bundle of 10^3 particles each of > which carries and energy of 10^15 ev would need to be annihilated to > produce the total energy observed in the polar energy burst. > > If the entire particle bundle is annihilated simultaneously in one > instant, the particle shower that this released energy would produce might > equal the observed energy production of the particle shower. > > It seems impossible that a single high energy particle from space can > tunnel through the entire bulk of the earth without being annihilated and > defused by the immense amount of matter it would need to pass through. > What is reasonable to expect is that the huge particle shower must have > been generated on the surface of the earth directly under the detection > antenna and the neutron detectors in the antarctic ice sheet. A entangled > cluster of ultra dense matter produced by some natural method like a > volcano seems a likely candidate to explain this mystery. > > By the way, Mark LeClair observed a quasiparticle(water crystal) produced > by cavitation that excavated a spiral trench in a copper rod that extended > for 2 meters. The amount of stored power it would take to dig such a trench > is truly huge. > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 3:43 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 12 Oct 2018 15:12:31 -0400: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >Please look at this document from L.I. URUTSKOEV who coined the term >> >"Strange Radiation" >> > >> > >> http://disq.us/url?url=http%3A%2F%2Faflb.ensmp.fr%2FAFLB-297%2Faflb297m330.pdf%3A3YRq8EiVHq9VyTnY_19ahXnNf5A&cuid=2168707 >> > >> >page 1160 part 4 >> > >> >"Rather surprising is the mere fact of recording radiation at the >> distance >> >of 1 to 2 m from the setup. Indeed, the radiation had to emerge from the >> >setup, pass through the air and penetrate two layers of black paper >> wrapped >> >around the detectors. It is clear that a charged particle would not >> travel >> >this distance. The other remarkable fact is that the particle energy >> >estimated from the blackening area under the assumption of Coulomb >> >interaction equals E ~700 MeV. However, in this case, ?-electrons, or a >> >“hairy leg,” as nuclear physicists would say, should be observed. >> However, >> >it can be seen from the Figures that the “leg” is “shaven”, that is, no >> >?-electrons are involved." >> > >> >700MeV AFTER it has come out of device, travelled 1-2m in air and >> >penetrated 2 layers of black paper! >> > >> > >> >Strange radiation has been shown to carry energy beyond 1 million GeV. >> >> I suspect that's a typo. Did you mean 1 GeV? >> >> 700 MeV < mass of a proton or neutron. Perhaps an energetic muon from >> decay of a >> Baryon? >> >> >> >without demonstrating any electrical charge. Such a energy storage >> >mechanism must be formed from a cluster of atoms rather than just sub >> >atomic particles such as neutrons. >> Regards, >> >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> local asymmetry = temporary success >> >>
