No, I stated 1 million GeV correctly. See http://restframe.com/downloads/tachyon_monopoles.pdf
I beleive what Keith Fredericks is seeing is an analoge tackyon as characterized as a quasiparticle. It is actually a molecule of ultra dense matter that can host a superconductive condensate of polaritons. This quasiparticle is a monopole and can store a huge amount of energy. Many seemingly impossible observations in science might be explained by LENR. Here is one that might be one that could be explained by this monopole quasiparticle. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/09/oddball-particles-tunneling-through-earth-could-point-new-physics Oddball particles tunneling through Earth could point to new physics By Adrian Cho Sep. 27, 2018 Are these ultra high energy particles being produced by the LENR reaction on the surface or just inside the earth? We might consider that these high energy particle bursts are coming from the surface of the earth or just inside it. Only particle reactions involving ultra dense matter might store enough power to generate these powerful and yet unexplained particle showers. The reference article estimates that the energy produced in the particle shower. However, the showers’ large sizes show that the particles must have had energies in excess of 0.5 exa-electron volts—70,000 times higher than the energy achieved with the most powerful particle accelerator. This amount of energy released as stated in the article is 10^18 ev. A million GeV would come to 10^15 Ev. This large amount of energy release needs to be explained in terms of possible LENR reactions. This large amount of energy store might be explained in terms of the energy content released in the tracks of strange radiation that has been detected in numerous LENR experiments. Keith Fredericks has calculated the energy released by monopole based strange radiation that Keith has produced and also by other researchers included in the studies of Urutskoev, et.al, Ivoilov, Rodionov and Savvatimova, Priem et.al and Bardout et.al, Lochak, and Adamenko and Vysotskii. More recently, this type of particle track has also been seen by both MFMP and LION. LION has posted that he has seen a macro sized particle visible with his unaided eyes as a black body moving across a bright nickel surface. The more energy that these quaiparticles store, the bigger they get. And the really big ones can be seen with the unaided eyes. Using the photographic analysis method that Keith Fredericks explains in his paper as referenced above, Keith estimates the tracks were produced by a strange particle whose energy content reached the maximum energy (m'(eV/c2)) listed in table 7 of 4.6 x 10^15 electron volts. Keith Fredericks also states that strange particles have been detected in entangled bundles of many identically moving particles. The total energy content of these particle bundles is simply the sum of the individual energy content of each of these particles that are members of the entangled bundle aggregation. To reach 10^18 ev, an entangled particle bundle of 10^3 particles each of which carries and energy of 10^15 ev would need to be annihilated to produce the total energy observed in the polar energy burst. If the entire particle bundle is annihilated simultaneously in one instant, the particle shower that this released energy would produce might equal the observed energy production of the particle shower. It seems impossible that a single high energy particle from space can tunnel through the entire bulk of the earth without being annihilated and defused by the immense amount of matter it would need to pass through. What is reasonable to expect is that the huge particle shower must have been generated on the surface of the earth directly under the detection antenna and the neutron detectors in the antarctic ice sheet. A entangled cluster of ultra dense matter produced by some natural method like a volcano seems a likely candidate to explain this mystery. By the way, Mark LeClair observed a quasiparticle(water crystal) produced by cavitation that excavated a spiral trench in a copper rod that extended for 2 meters. The amount of stored power it would take to dig such a trench is truly huge. On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 3:43 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 12 Oct 2018 15:12:31 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >Please look at this document from L.I. URUTSKOEV who coined the term > >"Strange Radiation" > > > > > http://disq.us/url?url=http%3A%2F%2Faflb.ensmp.fr%2FAFLB-297%2Faflb297m330.pdf%3A3YRq8EiVHq9VyTnY_19ahXnNf5A&cuid=2168707 > > > >page 1160 part 4 > > > >"Rather surprising is the mere fact of recording radiation at the distance > >of 1 to 2 m from the setup. Indeed, the radiation had to emerge from the > >setup, pass through the air and penetrate two layers of black paper > wrapped > >around the detectors. It is clear that a charged particle would not travel > >this distance. The other remarkable fact is that the particle energy > >estimated from the blackening area under the assumption of Coulomb > >interaction equals E ~700 MeV. However, in this case, ?-electrons, or a > >“hairy leg,” as nuclear physicists would say, should be observed. However, > >it can be seen from the Figures that the “leg” is “shaven”, that is, no > >?-electrons are involved." > > > >700MeV AFTER it has come out of device, travelled 1-2m in air and > >penetrated 2 layers of black paper! > > > > > >Strange radiation has been shown to carry energy beyond 1 million GeV. > > I suspect that's a typo. Did you mean 1 GeV? > > 700 MeV < mass of a proton or neutron. Perhaps an energetic muon from > decay of a > Baryon? > > > >without demonstrating any electrical charge. Such a energy storage > >mechanism must be formed from a cluster of atoms rather than just sub > >atomic particles such as neutrons. > Regards, > > > Robin van Spaandonk > > local asymmetry = temporary success > >
