Dear Jones, Thanks for asking about our work. We have published this since JCMNS -Vol 24.
J-L Paillet, Andrew Meulenberg, "Deepening Questions about Electron Deep Orbits of the Hydrogen Atom," J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci. *26* (2017) 54–68, http://coldfusioncommunity.net/pdf/jcmns/v26/54_JCMNS-Vol26.pdf and are continuing to publish (from ICCF-21 presentations) 1. J-L Paillet, A. Meulenberg, "On highly relativistic deep electrons," ICCF-21, 21st International Conference for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science, 3 - 8 June, 2018, Fort Collins, CO USA, to be published in JCMNS, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxPrXqfNS5Q&feature=youtube http://viXra.org/abs/1902.0398 2. A. Meulenberg, J. L. Paillet, "Nuclear-waste remediation with femto-atoms and femto-molecules," ICCF-21, 21st International Conference for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science, 3 - 8 June, 2018, Fort Collins, CO USA, to be published in JCMNS, 2019, if I have time to get it finished. and to-be-published papers from two workshops and a chapter in a book. We have not published anything on the other models; although I did include a variation on Ed Storms' "crack" model as the basis for: A. Meulenberg, K.P. Sinha, “Composite model for LENR in linear defects of a lattice,” ICCF-18, 18th Int. Conf. on Cond. Matter Nuclear Science, Columbia, Missouri, 25/07/2013, Presentation slides at http://hdl.handle.net/10355/36818, video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcTSUJUCRHE I have been too busy looking at the Deep Dirac Levels with J-L Paillet since ICCF-18 to even write up this important paper, much less examine in detail models, which look at bound levels between the atomic ground-states and the relativistic deep levels. We are presently pursuing the relativistic deep-orbit electrons, which Jean-Luc has described so well, and their interaction with the nucleus. At least I will also be looking at the possibility that the relativistic-electron effects could lead to intra-nuclear components and interactions. Before 1995, I did derive (classically) the "fractional" orbits below the atomic ground state, but did not think these 1/n states to be important because they could not be reached by photonic processes. When I later found out what Mills had been doing, I emailed him my warning about these levels having too little angular momentum to form photons. He never responded, so he may have figured that out for himself and, much to his credit, he chose other approaches, which I considered a big step. However, I thought that he made a mistake going for plasma rather than solid state as a base. (If he were to use a UV light source or other means to invert the lowest hydrogen atomic levels and "seed" the mixture with annihilation radiation for stimulated emission, he might get a significant deep-level (not a fractional-level) population. However, without mirrors at that energy, the system is unlikely to lase.) I did not think much of the non-photonic options for my own CF models until I had looked more closely at cold fusion products (late in 2008). Andrew _ _ _ On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:00 AM Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Question for Andrew. The citation that comes up on Google for your most > recent paper seems to be: > > http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/230_JCMNS-Vol24.pdf > > Excellent, but it does not try to integrate similar concepts which are > floating around, such as those of Holmlid, Arata and Mills. > > Have you published anything which takes a look at the entire spectrum of > "deep electrons" ? > > Jones > > > Andrew Meulenberg wrote: > > > It takes something more to make relativistic electrons. That is where > the deep-electron orbits enter the picture. They can have binding energies > in the hundreds of keV and kinetic energies in the 100s of MeV. This would > *not > *give hot-fusion type results. Strangely enough, the deep orbits are long > predicted by relativistic quantum mechanics. They just were not believed > because nobody had seen them, or their results. With cold fusion, we can > now see their results. > > Andrew > >
