Here is a suggestion for Norront Fusion (Holmlid licensee) ...
Their website indicates they have three Holmlid-effect muon generators 
operating at the moment.
Suggestion: Hybrid Holmlid/Mizuno device for generating neutrons.
Place a magnetized Mizuno device in the output path of a 
Holmlid muon generator. Typically every muon catalyzes ahundred or so D+D 
fusions. A small muon output is thereby multiplied.

That is such a major improvement that physicists would be impressedto the 
extent that massive financial support would be shifted from ITER 
and other wasteful programs towards a fusion device with an actual 
commercial future.
There is no possible good outcome for ITER in the next 30 years, whereasa 
Holmlid/Mizuno type device could be ready in 30 days. (if you already havethe 
small muon generator).
Jones

   ------- 
  One interesting possibility arises from the experiment due to the factthat 
there is no fusion without a relatively strong magnetic field nor 
without very cold (but not liquid) deuterium gas in that strong field. 

Both conditions are required.

That intersection of two critical restrictions implies that a "temporary 
BEC" may exist under conditions where a full BEC is not seen. TheBEC assembles 
a dense target for muon interaction, on occasion.

IOW there is recurrent boson condensation but on a transient basis. 
Only in the condensed state will fusion occur. And only a small 
population of deuterons is every in that transient BEC state.

This was never considered, and no group pursued the finding further- probably 
because only a few muons from cosmic rays are available; 
and at the time there was no cheap and low energy way to produce muons.
That may have changed
   --------------------------------------- 
 
 The knock on cold fusion over the years has been lack of neutrons. 
Yet that "lack" is not accurate.

As it turns out, 15 years ago Mizuno and others performed a defining 
experiment. Problem is... almost nobody quotes it today, or even 
knows about it.
"Neutron emission from D2 gas in magnetic fields under low 
temperature" is the paper from 2004. Mizuno, Akimoto, Takahashi and Francesco 
Celanihttp://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTneutronemi.pdf
Summary
"We observed neutron emissions from pure deuterium gas after it was 
cooled in liquid nitrogen and placed in a magnetic field. Neutron emissions 
were observed in ten out of ten test cases. Neutron burst ... were 1000 
times higher than the background counts....We observed a clear neutron 
energy peak at 2.5MeV." (indicates d-d nuclear fusion)
Comment: why is this study not given the credit it deserves? The authors 
are top notch. The results are astounding. The experiment was partially 
replicated by Ahern at MIT. 

The neutron bursts align with cosmic ray bursts (which create muons 
which then catalyze fusion). 

The solenoid magnetic field of .8 T is large, but could be obtained using 
permanent magnets. This experiment begs to be replicated today using 
permanent magnets and a tiny muon source using laser irradiation.


    

Reply via email to