I think Jones is on the correct path. You need > 0.8 Tesla to get the effect.
________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 11:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mizuno - and possibly his most overlooked paper In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:52:43 +0000 (UTC): Hi Jones, > Here is a suggestion for Norront Fusion (Holmlid licensee) ... Send it to them. >Their website indicates they have three Holmlid-effect muon generators >operating at the moment. >Suggestion: Hybrid Holmlid/Mizuno device for generating neutrons. >Place a magnetized Mizuno device in the output path of a >Holmlid muon generator. Typically every muon catalyzes ahundred or so D+D >fusions. A small muon output is thereby multiplied. I think the "output path" is in every direction, but that's not a problem, just put the muon generator in a small cylinder concentric with a larger cylinder containing the D. Almost all the escaping muons will then pass through the D. The percentage used will increase with the length of the cylinders. > >That is such a major improvement that physicists would be impressedto the >extent that massive financial support would be shifted from ITER >and other wasteful programs towards a fusion device with an actual >commercial future. >There is no possible good outcome for ITER in the next 30 years, whereasa >Holmlid/Mizuno type device could be ready in 30 days. (if you already havethe >small muon generator). >Jones [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success
