However, we have no idea who these experts are, what they saw, or what they said. So that doesn't count. We can't make anything of it. Of course S&G have every right to keep this secret, but I suggest we pay no attention to them until they go public and publish a professional paper. In my opinion, secret projects have no credibility. ***I suspected as much. My bullshit detector is going off right and left. The simple fact is that anyone who CAN go and measure gamma rays credibly has not been publicly invited except over at LENR-Forum, where I was banned after being there for 5 years for accepting this invitation. Someone with a BSEE and 20 years' experience isn't enough for Alan, and he even said that if I had the expertise of Edward Teller that he wouldn't allow testing. Again : Bullshit.
Those are the elements of what it takes to bell the cat: Willingness, time, capability, wherewithal . Those who have the time and willingness are low on capability and wherewithal. Those who have the capabilty and wherewithal are low on willingness and time. Most of us can develop capability and wherewithal, but we can't really develop willingness and freed time . To be candid, there's one more element: Bullshit. When Celani pulled out his Geiger counter , Rossi climbed all over him because it could point to what he was using in his cells. Probably bullshit. MFMP announced they found gammas, Biberian replicated it 48 hours later, then they went off and tested other stuff without saying a word. Bullshit. Now we have MFMP coming back on line to send me a private message because they're not on Vortex-L nor here, how they quietly referenced the gammas in some peer reviewed thingie, surrounded by a ton of.... bullshit. Then we have Alan claiming he has gammas, so I'm ready to answer the question for myself as to what it would take me to overcome all the bullshit that's been thrown around over this gamma issue, and including the bullshit thrown around there. So you have my answer. It should be easy to underbid me for those who have a higher tolerance of bullshit. Then everyone's happy, and the cat gets belled. What's sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander. It does not appear to be a joke that I was banned, so you should be banned as well, for posting fraud. The serious contenders should be posting their underbids. Simple. Someone with the background goes and tests for gammas , then guess what -- it'll be the end of their career. I think they will be charging far more than $100k for doing something that ends their career, and we see the absolute result: SILENCE. As long as there is silence, there is no offer to test gammas. It's just career-ending bullshit. On 5/18/19, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Jed is >> already posted in as willing to do it for a cool $million. That >> makes me look cheap in comparison. >> > > That was a JOKE. > > > >> Of course I think Someone ELSE should bell the >> cat, like Jed Rothwell whom I posted as a good candidate, since he's >> tested cold fusion devices before. He declined. > > > I declined because I know nothing about gamma rays. I am totally > unqualified to test this claim. Also because I am in the U.S. There must be > hundreds of people in the UK qualified to do this. > > > The question is "what >> would it take for ME to bell the cat". This is the answer. >> > > That answer is absurd. It is $97,000 too expensive. A person would be > insane to pay that much, or to contribute to that effort. > > Not only that, but your entire approach is ass-backwards. Putting the cart > before the horse. No one should contribute any money to your proposed test > until the following has been done: > > 1. They have to INVITE YOU. Obviously!! > > 2. Smith & George have to publish a comprehensive report describing their > instruments, procedures and results. This is essential. People have to know > what you will see, and how to go about testing it. Let us have no > surprises. > > 3. Various experts should examine their report, critique it, and give > advice. They should say: "Sure, that looks good. Here's how I would test > it. Here are the instruments I would take." If they say, "I can't tell" or > "that doesn't sound like it is working" then no one should pay Kevin > O'Malley to go look at it. That would be a stupid waste of money. > > 4. In the GFM page, O'Malley should list his background, qualifications and > similar tests he has done in the past. He should post a detailed list of > the procedures he intends to do, and a detailed lists of expenses. Again, > no one should contribute a dime until that is made clear. We have no idea > whether he is qualified, or the right person for the job. Someone else in > the UK may be a much better choice. > > 5. O'Malley should list the planned "deliveries" from this project. He > should say that after he returns home, within a month he will publish a > report that confirms claims A, B and C made by Smith and George. (Or not > confirm them.) > > With any less preparation than this, you would be running off half-cocked. > You would probably waste the money and time. Do it carefully and > professionally, or don't do it at all. > > > > Smith and George had said that various experts visited them and gave the > project a positive evaluation. However, we have no idea who these experts > are, what they saw, or what they said. So that doesn't count. We can't make > anything of it. Of course S&G have every right to keep this secret, but I > suggest we pay no attention to them until they go public and publish a > professional paper. In my opinion, secret projects have no credibility. > That includes the project at Texas Tech. The people doing it are skilled > but for all I know they could be making terrible mistakes. >
