From: Brian Ahern

Macroscopic Au-Ag has no chance for RTSC …. However, nanoscale assemblies can 
result in ultra conduction.  Zero resistance, but no Meisner Effect.


Well, shouldn’t we give  the chaps from India the benefit of doubt…? 
OK … maybe not, but here is a hypothetical rationale for Au/Ag RTSC which fills 
in the blanks in Brian’s conclusion about nano-geometry. 
Although it is true that BCS theory successfully explains the lossless effect 
in terms of electron pairing theory (or did no at one time) and the formation 
of Cooper pairs  is only possible in so-called “high-symmetry space” groups 
(but gold and silver are not in that group)... there is more to the story. 
Main overriding conclusion – Nothing NOTHING in the field of high temperature 
superconductivity is as simple as it first seems. There are exceptions to every 
rule and then exceptions to the exceptions. 
To wit, more recently (2014) superconductivity was  seen in low-symmetry space 
groups (crystal structure which lacks spatial inversion symmetry). Gold 
compounds or alloys, specifically have shown the effect but not at room 
temperature. In particularly the National Institute for Materials Science 
(NIMS) synthesized a novel superconductor, SrAuSi3, which contains gold as a 
principal constituent. This only means that “symmetry space” is not simply a 
basic property of the elements involved, alone, but must also be considered in 
terms of a larger accumulation of atoms.
https://phys.org/news/2014-04-discovery-gold-based-superconductor.html
The reason that this could be relevant to the claim from India (if it is 
replicated) is then what is known as the Proximity effect or Holm-Meissner 
effect.
The proximity effect describe the phenomena of a superconductor placed in 
contact with a highly conductive non-superconductor. Typically signs of 
superconductivity are observed in the normal metal. Holm and Meissner observed 
zero resistance in contacts where two superconducting metals are separated by a 
thin film of a non-superconducting material. This opens the possibility of 
slight oxidation in the silver nanoparticles which then is then transferred to 
the gold via an extreme proximity effect.
OK – this is a stretch - and in a way it makes no one happy since impugns the 
Indian effort (unintended oxidation effect) but curiously no one has yet made a 
decent effort to find a way that this claim could work, as opposed to the 
knee-jerk reaction that it cannot work.
If it does work this way (proximity effect), and especially if the 
nano-geometry benefits from the precision of advanced chip lithography (10 nm 
silver dots) then copper can probably be substituted for gold making the 
process economically viable as well as technically viable.
Badhai, chaps… you may have opened the door.

From: JonesBeene 
 
This is a well-written article about the apparent claim of room temperature 
superconductivity coming from India last year,
 
https://thewire.in/the-sciences/iisc-room-temperature-superconductor-gold-silver-magnetic-susceptibility
 
The problem is that there is still no replication and the upgraded paper is 
less than adequate, given the importance of the claim.
 
 
Where are the replicators???
 
The interesting thing is that that only two elements are needed – gold and 
silver. Ubiquitous. Since these are readily available the critical detail then 
is getting the “nano” structure correct as clearly no alloy of gold and silver 
come close to RTSC by a factor of perhaps 10,000:1.
 
There could be alternative ways to do this, including sputtering.
 
For instance – we have a well developed nano-lithography industry in place in 
the computer chip industry.
 
If RTSC is indeed possible with any combination of nanostructure using silver 
and gold – there is no better place to stage a replication attempt than in a 
chip fab or lab.
 
Therefore the “gorilla in the closet” which everyone seems to be neglecting on 
this claim is IBM.
 
They set the standard for both HTSC, having invented it, and for state of the 
art chips. They have a ready market. There is no greater fit for this tech on 
planet earth.
 
Where art thou IBM ?
 
Given the big picture, I cannot imagine that you have not taken notice…
 
Jones
 
 

Reply via email to