>From the theory of hole superconductivity by JE Hirsch that Holmlid references, the electron position around the positive core of UDM is defined by the meissner effect pushing electrons out away from the positive core and the coulomb force pushing elections toward the positive core. Electron orbits don't matter anymore when superconductivity sets in. The meissner effect pushes out all electrons from the positive core to an exterior location to minimize kinetic energy as follows:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.4178 I would guess that the electron cloud would form a sub orbital spin wave on the outside of the positive core. On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:51 PM JonesBeene <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrew, > > > > The similarity and contrasts between your work on dense (small) hydrogen > and that of several others is truly remarkable. Many brilliant researchers > are looking at the shadows on Plato’s cave. A breakthrough is surely > imminent. > > > > Other scholarly papers would include those of Mills, Holmlid, Vav’ra, > Mayer, Dufour, Lawandy and several more - all of whom have insight and > mathematical formality … yet, are different in details and are generally > neglected - not given near enough credit by mainstream physics. The common > denominator is that hydrogen can become densified and this change radically > alters the dynamics of nuclear reactions – some of which may be strongly > energetic but not real fusion, after all. > > > > There is evidence from Russia/Germany that paired protons collisions - > which almost never actually fuse – will nevertheless produce pions – as > Holmlid suggests. This is more meaningful in the context of Cerefolini’s > “binuclear atom” and provides the easy way to D fusion using the muon, as a > decay product of the pion. > > > > In the end – Not much fusion yet excess energy due to pion mass being > converted into energy. I wish the following paper went a little deeper or > there was a followup - “Near-threshold pion production in diproton > reactions” by Sergey Dymov for the ANKE collaboration > > > > https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/295/1/012095 > > > > Most of the pieces of the puzzle are out there… > > ---------------- > > > > Andrew Meulenberg wrote: Jean-Luc Paillet and I are interested in this > 2nd link “A simple argument that small hydrogen may exist” > > https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319303624, > <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319303624> > because we think that 5 (out of 6) sections support our contention that > deep-orbit electrons are the theoretical basis for cold fusion… > > > > > > >
