https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.4178
equations 23a, 23b, and 23c are the calculated values that Holmlid has experimentally verified. On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 9:24 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <[email protected]> wrote: > Hirsch's papers clearly show that super conduction is a spin effect as all > his math is based on induced circular movement. If neighbor SO(4) > trajectories connect the electron magnetic flux can freely move through any > matter. As the radius of mass increases the Meissner rotation starts as a > simple analogy to the Coriolis force provided by electrons moving outwards > to a larger radius. Such an effect cannot be modeled by QM as it needs a 4D > (= 4 rotation) space concept to model a connected spin-orbit . > > Regarding deep orbits: > > There is absolutely no physical solution for the forces for any QM based > model for deep orbits. The basic rules of any physical model that includes > mass are given by the de Broglie radius. Any violation of the coulomb > mass/EM-mass relation needs an additional explanation by a new physical > concept, that has never been given by anybody that modeled deep orbits. > > E.g. a deep orbit of 400keV means that the electron mass classically > should increase to a manyfold value of 400keV. But there is no mechanism to > increase the classic central force if we do not include magnetic central > forces. But these forces are not covered by QM and need a different > treatment based on rotations only! > > Jürg > On 11.06.2019 22:03, Axil Axil wrote: > > From the theory of hole superconductivity by JE Hirsch that Holmlid > references, the electron position around the positive core of UDM is > defined by the meissner effect pushing electrons out away from the positive > core and the coulomb force pushing elections toward the positive core. > Electron orbits don't matter anymore when superconductivity sets in. The > meissner effect pushes out all electrons from the positive core to an > exterior location to minimize kinetic energy as follows: > > https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.4178 > > I would guess that the electron cloud would form a sub orbital spin wave > on the outside of the positive core. > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:51 PM JonesBeene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Andrew, >> >> >> >> The similarity and contrasts between your work on dense (small) hydrogen >> and that of several others is truly remarkable. Many brilliant researchers >> are looking at the shadows on Plato’s cave. A breakthrough is surely >> imminent. >> >> >> >> Other scholarly papers would include those of Mills, Holmlid, Vav’ra, >> Mayer, Dufour, Lawandy and several more - all of whom have insight and >> mathematical formality … yet, are different in details and are generally >> neglected - not given near enough credit by mainstream physics. The common >> denominator is that hydrogen can become densified and this change radically >> alters the dynamics of nuclear reactions – some of which may be strongly >> energetic but not real fusion, after all. >> >> >> >> There is evidence from Russia/Germany that paired protons collisions - >> which almost never actually fuse – will nevertheless produce pions – as >> Holmlid suggests. This is more meaningful in the context of Cerefolini’s >> “binuclear atom” and provides the easy way to D fusion using the muon, as a >> decay product of the pion. >> >> >> >> In the end – Not much fusion yet excess energy due to pion mass being >> converted into energy. I wish the following paper went a little deeper or >> there was a followup - “Near-threshold pion production in diproton >> reactions” by Sergey Dymov for the ANKE collaboration >> >> >> >> https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/295/1/012095 >> >> >> >> Most of the pieces of the puzzle are out there… >> >> ---------------- >> >> >> >> Andrew Meulenberg wrote: Jean-Luc Paillet and I are interested in this >> 2nd link “A simple argument that small hydrogen may exist” >> >> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319303624, >> <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319303624> >> because we think that 5 (out of 6) sections support our contention that >> deep-orbit electrons are the theoretical basis for cold fusion… >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr. 22 > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > +41 44 760 14 18 > +41 79 246 36 06 > >
