>From the LENR forum regarding Can's woodpecker experiment. Alan Smith states:
"If you read the history of LENR, you will see that often you get the best results when you turn off the power!" Can replies: It does feel that the best results are obtained by cycling power on and off, but I also saw that at the end of the longer power-on runs Geiger counts eventually start increasing relatively quickly. It's difficult to tell for sure what is actually important since the processes observed are slow. Something slowly "builds up", in a way or another. The LENR reaction is counter intuitive and therefore very hard on its experimenters. It totally confuses them. Why does the radiation increase when the power is turned off? Why does cycling the power produce the most gamma radiation? If you read my posts, you now know the answer to explain those paradoxes. On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:31 PM JonesBeene <[email protected]> wrote: > > > *From: *Axil Axil <[email protected]> > > > > Quote from: Dr. Pamela Mosier-Boss > SPAWAR Systems Center San Diego, CA > > “We believe the two phenomena, LENR and high T c superconductivity, are > related and that both need to be investigated in order to gain an > understanding of the processes occurring inside the Pd lattice... Tripodi > et al developed a method of loading and stabilizing 50 µm diameter Pd > wires with Pd loadings greater than one. These samples have exhibited near > room temperature superconductivity. Examples of measured superconductivity > … are shown in Figure 1-2.” End of quote > > > > In addition to this – and due to the implications of the recent Mizuno > findings, there is a likelihood that one form of HTSC is present well above > room temperature - up to several hundred degrees C. This could be lossless > spin-current (as opposed to electron flux) and need not be a bulk effect > but instead a local effect of the palladium nanoparticle in a plasmon > environment. > > > > This explanation adds complexity but at least none of the details rises to > the incredulity level of nuclear fusion events providing kilowatts of heat > with zero radiation. Ample evidence exists for both Coulomb explosions and > for the well-known “proximity effect” AKA Holm-Meissner effect which may > apply to elevated temperature superconductivity in an interfacial > plasmonic system. A good theory exists, as Jürg proposes, for spin-current > superconductivity - which is a better fit for the experiment since it also > provides the impetus behind the Coulomb explosion, the locus of gain.. > > > > As always, the proof of every hypothesis will be found in the reproducible > experiment. We anxiously await replication of Mizuno’s breakthrough. > > > > Jones > > > > > > > >
