By the way, a heavy dose of strong magnetism will destroy the coherence of the Bose condensation and associated superposition and let the gamma radiation be realized.
Critical field https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_field On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 9:18 PM Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > From the LENR forum regarding Can's woodpecker experiment. > > Alan Smith states: > > "If you read the history of LENR, you will see that often you get the best > results when you turn off the power!" > > Can replies: > > It does feel that the best results are obtained by cycling power on and > off, but I also saw that at the end of the longer power-on runs Geiger > counts eventually start increasing relatively quickly. It's difficult to > tell for sure what is actually important since the processes observed are > slow. Something slowly "builds up", in a way or another. > > The LENR reaction is counter intuitive and therefore very hard on its > experimenters. It totally confuses them. Why does the radiation increase > when the power is turned off? > > Why does cycling the power produce the most gamma radiation? > > If you read my posts, you now know the answer to explain those paradoxes. > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:31 PM JonesBeene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> *From: *Axil Axil <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> Quote from: Dr. Pamela Mosier-Boss >> SPAWAR Systems Center San Diego, CA >> >> “We believe the two phenomena, LENR and high T c superconductivity, are >> related and that both need to be investigated in order to gain an >> understanding of the processes occurring inside the Pd lattice... Tripodi >> et al developed a method of loading and stabilizing 50 µm diameter Pd >> wires with Pd loadings greater than one. These samples have exhibited near >> room temperature superconductivity. Examples of measured superconductivity >> … are shown in Figure 1-2.” End of quote >> >> >> >> In addition to this – and due to the implications of the recent Mizuno >> findings, there is a likelihood that one form of HTSC is present well above >> room temperature - up to several hundred degrees C. This could be lossless >> spin-current (as opposed to electron flux) and need not be a bulk effect >> but instead a local effect of the palladium nanoparticle in a plasmon >> environment. >> >> >> >> This explanation adds complexity but at least none of the details rises >> to the incredulity level of nuclear fusion events providing kilowatts of >> heat with zero radiation. Ample evidence exists for both Coulomb explosions >> and for the well-known “proximity effect” AKA Holm-Meissner effect which >> may apply to elevated temperature superconductivity in an interfacial >> plasmonic system. A good theory exists, as Jürg proposes, for spin-current >> superconductivity - which is a better fit for the experiment since it also >> provides the impetus behind the Coulomb explosion, the locus of gain.. >> >> >> >> As always, the proof of every hypothesis will be found in the >> reproducible experiment. We anxiously await replication of Mizuno’s >> breakthrough. >> >> >> >> Jones >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
