Dear Bob, It is my feeling that when a Bose condensate induced time dilation state is encompassing any transmutation activity, that time dilation allows the nuclear and particle mechanisms to come to a quiescent and stable state almost instantly in the reference frame outside the zone of transmutation activity.
How the final results that come out of the transmutation process is completely stabilized no matter what that transmutation process entails. Simply put, in all cases, matter that enters the transmutation process whether that matter is acted upon by any nuclear or sub nuclear process including fusion, fission, alpha, beta, and gamma radiation, a newly reconfigured stable resultant elemental product comes out. On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 11:41 PM bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Axil--- > > > > There are various theory papers in the offing or already on the street > that indicate that nucleons (protons and neutrons) are made up of 9 muons, > which in turn are made up of positrons and electrons. > > > > Binding forces for the nucleons involve neutrinos and EM fields generated > by the electrons and positrons. > > > > These models are validated by energetic electron inelastic scattering > experiments over the years. This validation is addressed > > by William L Stubbs in his recent book, *Nuclear Alternative: > Redesigning Our Model of the Structure of Matter.* > > > > Additional physical models for electrons and positrons are still being > finalized to address mass and energy equivalence, nuclear physical > structures, binding energies angular momentum/spin phenomena and it > conservation, etc. This Modeling has been a collaboration of interested > people that organized after the ICCF-21 Conference at Fort Collins in > 2018. > > > > Together these models suggest that muons may very well result from nuclear > transitions associated with LENR events. They also suggest LENR controls > to avoid energetic free muon production. > > > > As I have suggest many times in the past on this blog, a key design > objective for LENR reactors is to control the process so as to avoid free > energetic particles and their associated radiation hazard. This can be > achieved by inducing coherent systems to give up nuclear spin energy to > lattice electron spin/thermal energy. Conservation of angular momentum is > conserved, much as kinetic energy/linear momentum is conserved in free > particle elastic scattering interactions. Resonant EM fields are key to > accomplishing desired control, as well as, the ambient magnetic fields, > including and local microscopic B fields. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent: *Saturday, July 13, 2019 5:15 PM > *To: *vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:If Mizuno is correct, this design is likely to be the > precursor to all future device designs > > *Furthermore, from studying LENR results over the years, it is becoming > increasingly apparent to me that LENR has a major issue to deal with. LENR > makes matter and energy disappear. A major problem with LENR reactors is > that they fall apart over time. This highly corrosive effect that these > reactors suffer is due to this nasty issue of matter and energy > degeneration. This degenerative process only gets worse when the power > output level of the reactor goes up.* > > *And yet the amazing contradiction that the LENR reaction presents is that > it does not produce any high energy particles or ionizing radiation. The > question that hangs in the air is where does all that matter and energy go > when the LENR reaction is active?* > > * At this current juncture, the reactor meltdown/corrosion problem has > delayed any LENR application from reaching a successful conclusion. LENR is > highly corrosive of the structure of the reactor as a function of its power > output. Clearly, LENR's ability to corrode the structure of the reactor is > a function of its power output. A low powered LENR reactor will function > for a long time but its usefulness is limited. A high output reactor even > if it is built like a tank does not perform for very long.* > > *The lack of nuclear reaction byproducts and the corrosion issue might > well be connected.* > > *In addition, I think that transmutation happens when the LENR reaction > has completed. For some unknown reason the LENR reaction in the LION > diamond was episodic. There were three episodes when the LENR reaction came > alive. Each of the episodes of activity produced a different transmutation > product. But at the end of each episode of activity, each time the > identical transmutation product was deposited at the ends of many tunnels. > The miners were all contained inside the tunnels that they excavated. But > they all behaved identically and communicated. They all acted in concert to > transmute carbon into identical elements when they were active.* > > *From what we saw how the miners worked inside diamond, the transmuted > elements are held in invisible suspension through QM superposition inside > the flux tube until the LENR reaction had completed. Then the transmuted > elements stabilized into their final form. We saw the diamond disappear as > the miners excavated the tunnel, Then when the LENR reaction finalized, the > transmutated elements appeared at the far end of the tunnel.* > > *When I considered what happens to the matter that the miners excavated > from their tunnels, I got confused. There are spaces inside those > completely closed tubes. Where did that matter go? Where did the energy > from transmutation of carbon go? There was a lot of transmutation but very > little if any damage produced by heat evident inside those tubes. The > matter that was removed from those tubes could have supported the energy > needs of a city for a year is it was transformed into energy.* > > *I think that transmutation happened when the LENR reaction completed. For > some unknown reason the LENR reaction in the LION diamond was episodic. > There were three episodes when the LENR reaction came alive. Each of the > episodes of activity produced a different transmutation product. But at the > end of each episode of activity, each time the identical transmutation > product was deposited at the ends of many tunnels. The miners were all > contained inside the tunnels that they excavated. But they all behaved > identically and communicated. They all acted in concert to transmute carbon > into identical elements when they were active.* > > *Here is my take on this issue. I believe that LENR involves the > interaction of two major cosmological principles: Quantum mechanical > superposition and general relativity. Through looking at the results of > some recent LENR experiments, it appears that during the LENR reaction, > time stops inside the Black EVO as discovered by Ken Shoulders. When LENR > active processes occur, such as transmutation and superposition/tunneling, > they occur under a condition where time is not moving forward. This > superposition proceeds as a macro level quantum mechanical process that is > occurring were both material and energy in bulk is made to dematerialize or > tunnel possibly in a state of coherent superposition. This coherent > material may be removed in a condition that is out of sync with normal > matter and time and being in the state of superposition not able to > interact with its previously normal form except through the force of > gravity. Remaining perpetually coherent, it is a superfluid. This lack of > energy and particle realization while the LENR reaction is active could be > why LENR has not killed the experimenters that work with LENR reactors.* > > *This disappearing corroded matter and energy could be where dark matter > is coming from.* > > *In summary, this dark matter could be the result of a continuing > ubiquitous in as not yet recognized intersection of general relativity and > quantum mechanical tunneling during this corrosion process that transforms > normal matter into a ghost state possibly through a time based out of sync > situation between normal matter and space-time. * > > *We should not make certain assumptions about the LENR reaction and the > reactors that produce it. LENR may have many mind bending situations ahead > for those who what to tame its secrets.* > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 5:22 PM Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I believe that if Mizuno's results are correct, and especially if Ed > Storms' theory is right, this design will be the precursor to all future > devices. As I usually do, I look back at other technologies. The first > transistor was the precursor to all subsequent devices, even though the > methods of making them changed rapidly, and even though the material > changed from germanium to silicon. The first airplane was the precursor to > all subsequent airplanes. > > > > There were many different approaches to building airplanes circa 1900, > such as A. G. Bell, Maxim and Lilienthal. Those were smart people. Their > ideas deserved respect, although the efforts did not make much progress. > However, in 1906 the Wright patent was issued. All successful airplanes > after that have been based on their discovery, which was 3-axis control. > Also, all successful airplanes have wings with chambers similar to this, > and similar length to width ratios. These are very different from > Lilienthal and other early attempts. The Wrights were superb engineers and > they had rigorous proof these were the best chambers and ratios, at the low > speed their airplane was designed for. > > In other words, every airplane after 1906 is a descendant evolved from > this design, and all other precursor designs are extinct. > > Needless to say, there has been tremendous progress in aviation. There was > tremendous progress between 1908 and 1914. By 1914, there were airplanes > that could fly 6 passengers for hours, going thousands of miles. Outwardly, > they looked completely different from the pusher design of the Wrights, > with the elevator in front. But from the engineering physics point of view, > they were similar. They owed the Wrights royalties for the patent. > > If the Mizuno design actually works and it is widely replicated, it will > probably be the starting point for all future designs, just as the 1906 > Wright patent design was. But there will be tremendous progress. It is > likely there is fundamentally only one effective design, just as there is > only one way to control an airplane (with 3-axis control). Future designs > may look very different outwardly, but the microscopic morphology and other > details of the surface where the reaction occurs will probably be similar. > Especially if Ed is correct, as I hope he is. Ed tells me he thinks this > morphology can be created with techniques similar to those used to make > microscopic integrated circuits. > > > > >
