Do you know the story of Direc and the positron? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron <https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPositron%3AVbGDqZeTCzWIjvALMvl045zDPdI&cuid=2168707>
The positron is a negative particle going backward in time, but when time is reversed so is the charge and the energy of the positron is turned positive (parity-time (PT) state change) (PT symmetry breaking) . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-Hermitian_quantum_mechanics <https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FNon-Hermitian_quantum_mechanics%3A92f4zm3xoCHLI0EcbzY5Ylj3D8A&cuid=2168707> In a gravity black hole, the gravitational singularity reverses time and the positive energy particle becomes a negative energy particle again. In an analog black hole (a polariton condensate), there is no singularity so the infalling particle remains a positive energy particle. This is true for photons. Photons with negative frequency are positive energy particles. These negative frequency photons are where the 100 to 200 nm EUV photons are coming from in the SK reactor each time the analog black hole explodes (Bosenova). . Unlike in a gravity based black hole, there is no gravitational singularity to reverse time in an analog black hole and the positive energy negative frequency photon stays a positive energy particle. Yes it is complicated, and it is a work in progress. On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 2:24 AM Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEOXYLtbVuvynWTHXLXofKSUqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowzuOICzCZ4ocDMO7xqQY?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen > > Quantum properties can be separated from particles. If particles are also > waves, tt's like separating the music produced by drums from the sounds > produced by a band. > > An electron is comprised of a set of quantum properties just like the > music of a band is composed of sounds made by individual instruments. > These properties direct the behavior of the electron. Unlike free electrons > in a vacuum, these quantum properties can be isolated from other quantum > properties when the electron is part of a solid. > > The coming thing in condensed matter physics and quantum engineering is > the ability in general to select these quantum properties of both fermions > (electrons) and/or bosons (photons) that are useful and discard the others. > > It is two of these properties (isospin and hypercharge) called spinors > that make up the contents of the Bose condensate. Hypercharge gives quarks > and electrons mass. It is what the Higgs field is comprised of. It is > possible to isolate this property and apply it to quarks. > > It is now possible to build a material (LENR Fuel) that hosts electron > based quasiparticles that mix and match the quantum properties selected > from one or more of its fundamental particle quantum properties that are > useful (EVO) and to ignore or restrict the other less advantageous ones. > The selected quantum properties can be strengthened and protected while > other properties can be ignored. > > It is possible to isolate hypercharge from electrons and condense this > mass giving property into a plasmoid. called an EVO. When the greatly > amplified analog Higgs field that has been extracted from electrons are > applied to quarks, this field produces transmutation. > > The Higgs field carries the weak force. It is possible to greatly amplify > the Higgs field by extracting hypercharge from the electron and > condensing it in a bose condensate. > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:56 PM Jonathan Berry <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> BTW, a necessary part of that theory of "part filled containers". the >> idea that electrons, protons and such might be able to exist with less that >> their regular level of energy and density, and that such energy might be >> hard to detect and read... Yet be felt as Bioenergy, Chi, Orgone, Scalar. >> etc... >> >> But if a form of subtle matter and antimatter and it can annihilate, why >> doesn't it annihilate with regular matter releasing lots of energy??? >> My guess would be that it does/can, but that equal sums of energy are >> extracted from both and as such the regular particle loses close to nothing >> as it can only lose as much as the lesser party, unless the "soft" particle >> has quite a bit of energy in it. >> >> It could however be that neither can interact or annihilate unless they >> are at the same or a very close level of energy. >> >> If this interpretation of virtual particles not reasonable? >> >> Couldn't I have found a way of increasing the virtual particle >> flux/emission/production? >> >> BTW, following this line of reasoning I have created my most tangible >> energy yet. >> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 2:43 PM Jonathan Berry <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Vorts, I have an interesting connection my research has made that >>> seems to connect to anti-matter. >>> >>> As some of you might know (I have been on this list for what, 20 years) >>> I began researching the aether, and then 7-8 years ago I made an unusual >>> coil that emitted an energy that could be felt, that seemed to be "aether" >>> like. >>> One observation I made about this technology was the tendency for an >>> energy to form in the center of a circle, and then this energy would have >>> "beams" come out of it, with one energy going up, and down, one north, one >>> south, one east, one west and then also diagonals, making 8 primary beams >>> in each direction. But the number isn't important. >>> >>> This turns out to be not to be a unique discovery, this has been noted >>> by others.... >>> Then the other day I came to realize that the energy going in the >>> opposite direction, happens to "cancel" out the energy! >>> So the energy that goes north and the energy that goes south annihilate >>> each other! >>> >>> So, then I started to wonder with more seriousness, "What if my >>> 'Aetheric Energy'" is virtual particle pairs? >>> I did also find that applying a potential (magnetic, electric, or other) >>> would polarize and increase this activity. >>> >>> So, I began to speculate the following... >>> Circles with the right energetic activity create a focal point that >>> expresses more virtual particles than the background... >>> That the fields helps split the virtual particles apart... >>> >>> And, now we come to the Crux of this post... >>> >>> When two virtual particles annihilate, what happens??? >>> Answer, nothing! >>> >>> What happens when two regular particles annihilate??? >>> Release of energy, Gamma! >>> >>> What happens when one half of a virtual particle pair falls into the >>> event horizon of a black hole according to accepted science? (Hawking >>> radiation) >>> It becomes a real particle that if it then annihilates with another real >>> particle releases energy... >>> >>> So, the crux of the question is, "what change occurs to the virtual >>> particle to make it real"? >>> And I would propose the answer is simply, Time! >>> >>> Here is what i suspect is going on! >>> When a virtual particle is made, it is like an empty container, when it >>> annihilates nothing happens. >>> However, if energy is "given" to the virtual particle, then it isn't any >>> longer empty, but it might not have enough energy to be detected as a >>> regular solid particle yet. >>> >>> However, when it now annihilates, it will release the energy it does >>> have. >>> >>> I think the idea that just because it's other half fell into a black >>> hole it instantly becomes "real" is nonsense, what if it's partner >>> annihilated with another virtual particle, wouldn't that accomplish much >>> the same! Now I just implied that all of space should emit Hawking >>> radiation. >>> >>> When I look at some of the details of Free Energy device claims, >>> Antigravity and the like, there is evidence of "half way" electrons and >>> mysterious releases of light, could this be partly filled "virtual" >>> particles annihilating and releasing light? >>> it would make a lot of sense, and it makes sense with regards to Quantum >>> Physics too! >>> >>> If anyone wants to experience the forms that create this tangible >>> energy, just ask. >>> >>> >>> John >>> >>>
