Mark,
Very interesting.
There are going to be a few who will opine that this technology is the result
of reverse engineering of debris from crash sites. Never mind the 60 year
lapse. Plus, there seems to be too little detail in the disclosure and too much
unsupported imagination. More like SciFi.
Hopefully you will dig up some more info on this. Very interesting !
Jones
Zeropoint wrote: Vorts!
Long time no chat… busy working on Navy radar. It’s been a few years, but I
check in every now and then to see if any real progress has been made with LENR
or… you know who! ;-) Not much has changed…
RE: Superconductivity…
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29232/navys-advanced-aerospace-tech-boss-claims-key-ufo-patent-is-operable
Just so happens that the scientist/engineer patenting some very unusual patents
for the Navy works at PAX River… been there many times over the last 3 years.
I’ll have to look him up next time I’m there… perhaps soon.
The guy’s boss, Dr. Sheehy, also at PAX, had to write to the patent office
after the patents were rejected… of course, since some claims were ‘not
theoretically possible’. In the letter, Dr. Sheehy states that the technology
is ‘enabled AND operable’.
Happy Holiday Reading!!
-Mark Iverson
From: Jones Beene <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2019 7:32 AM
To: vortex <[email protected]>
Subject: [Vo]:Superconductivity in nickel oxide
Nickel oxides are interesting in the context of LENR, as are iron oxides. Oxide
films are expected on nickel electrodes and this could set the stage for
unexpected electromagnetic effects such as the "densification" effect on
gaseous hydrogen, which precedes LENR.
Here is the new citation for the discovery of (global) superconductivity in NiO
https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.4337
Superconductivity - of a local variety as opposed to global - has been long
suspected to be involved in LENR in some mysterious way. This suspicion goes
back to the discovery of global superconductivity in palladium hydride (at very
low temp) and the possibility that paired electrons could shield Coulomb
repulsion, or some related M.O. which promotes LENR. This could happen via the
densification of hydrogen as described by many researchers, notably Mills and
Holmlid. A related effect to local SC is "transient" SC.
Local superconductivity would occur in nanoparticles at much higher
temperature, where spin currents or excitons predominate. There is also a
potential connection between antiferromagnetism and local superconductivity
which would indicate that strong antiferromagnetism is actually an expected end
result of local superconductivity.
The further connection of all of this to LENR would be that nanoparticles of
materials which are SC at low temps will - at high temps - show both local
superconductivity and strong antiferromagnetism which then operates to densify
hydrogen gas as it accumulates on its surface.
Here is the older report on using spin current to flip iron-based
superconductors between superconducting and non-superconducting states.
https://phys.org/news/2017-12-scientists-superconductivity-currents.html
It is not difficult to imagine an overlap between a spin current mechanism and
strong antiferromagnetism - but I have not been able to find an authoritative
paper which makes that claim.
