Another question for Jurg is whether or not the SO(4) theory provides a stable physical structure for higher mass isotopes—for example, Ni, Fe and other nuclear species showing up in LENR experiments?
The thought that generates this question is the idea that a collection of nucleons making up a heavy isotope may not all be subject to the same attractive force at the same time. Some may be loosely held depending upon their respective position in three dimensional space of a particular isotope with its orientation dependent upon the direction of its over all magnetic dipole. As I suggest earlier in this thread, the nuclear weak interaction is really a magnetic dipole attractive force of all the constituent elementary particles—electrons, positrons and neutrinos. This brings up another question for Jurg: What does SO(4) physics say about neutrinos and their spin and angular momentum? Bob Cook Bob Cook From: Jürg Wyttenbach<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 7:00 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Strange things keep turning up.... It is interesting how many fantasies are developed around SM framework that so far has no clue what generates the weak force and how to measure it. In SO(4) physics the force coefficient (1FC) for the weak force is exactly defined and allows to calculate the correct electron/electron spin pairing energy and also one coupling orbit of deuterium and much more. The generation of a di-neutron from protons is bare nonsense and absurd fantasy as this would need an input energy of 782keV/neutron. The other story we (SO(4) physics) can exactly calculate is the H*-H* bond that in some nuclear reaction can add like a double neutron. But the underlying LENR reaction is far more complex than the SM can imagine. We have perfect spectral measurements of such a reaction which looks like adding a double neutron. In a few years LENR will be the dominant field of nuclear physics and people interested in the standard model have to listen the history channel. J.W. Am 19.12.19 um 04:14 schrieb [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>: >From the Abstract of the reference: “These reactions involve the weak force (Feynman Diagrams are shown), but they take place in simple electrochemical systems that are normally thought of in terms of the electromagnetic forces only. The combined influence of the four isotope effects explains thousands of, what were considered, anomalous observations by top electrochemical researchers. The newly described mechanistic effects involve a very important and almost forgotten intermediate (the di-neutron) and may even involve unique safety concerns.” It certainly suggests that the “weak force” is really an EM force between nucleons—i.e., protons and neutrons or deuterons, as has been suggested by Hatt, Stubbs and many others… between electrons and positrons making up nucleons and resulting magnetic dipoles that cause an attraction between nucleons. ITS NOT NEW!! 1 Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Jones Beene<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 8:32 AM To: vortex<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [Vo]:Strange things keep turning up This mystery reference appeared in a recent search. None of the usual players and the impression given is that the topic is something new... WTF? Hydrogen and deuterium isotope effects beyond the electromagnetic force<https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/hydrogen-deuterium-isotope-effects-beyond-electromagnetic-force/> [cid:[email protected]] [cid:[email protected]] Hydrogen and deuterium isotope effects beyond the electromagnetic force Cheryl D. Stevenson (2018) Stevenson, Davis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. A mechanism is presented concerning electroly... -- Jürg Wyttenbach Bifangstr.22 8910 Affoltern a.A. 044 760 14 18 079 246 36 06
