Bob,

Since I have been working on the deep-electron orbit model and its
consequences (e.g., femto-H and femto-molecules) for the last decade, most
of your questions have already been answered (see the links below - from
ICCF-21- and the references therein).
http://coldfusioncommunity.net/pdf/jcmns/v29/353_JCMNS-Vol29.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6zQXb-L7L8&t=136s

Your suggestion about dense water is clearly an interesting extension of
this work. However, the dense water would be only marginally denser since
the molecule formed with femto-H and 16O could act as a 18O halo nuclide
(not yet found, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_nucleus). The fact
that 17O and 18O are stable nuclei means that either halo nucleus
(femto-molecules) is less stable than the heavier isotopes.

A study of the individual halo nuclides and their decay modes (e.g.,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_boron#Boron-19 vs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_boron#Boron-8) can give
information about the nature of the femto-molecular bond formed between the
femto-H and a heavier nucleus.

I am presently writing a paper on the transition from a femto-H atom to a
neutron (as a proton with an occupied deeper-electron orbit), so my
responding to your comments has been useful in my thinking. Thank you.

Andrew

On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 8:11 PM [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Dense hydrogen may react with some other elements to form useful dense
> compounds—maybe dense water.  That may be a problem for biological systems,
> however.  However it may be a good heat transfer medium with a high boiling
> point and a high triple point above that for light water.
>
>
>
> In the mid 60’s I remember an incident of the identification of dense
> water—that was the term used by the physics folks I worked with then-- and
> I didn’t think it was fake news.  The subject went dark shortly
> thereafter.
>
>
>
> If dense H can be accelerated by its magnetic moment—I assume it has
> one—then it may act more like a neutron at some energy and fuse at
> relatively low energies.  Dense D or T may even work to fuse at lower
> temperatures.
>
>
>
> I wonder if Mills has done the calculations for a D-heavy—D-heavy fusion?
> T-heavy may not have a decay mode with the close valence electron keeping
> the extra nuclear electrons in tact.  (This assumes the structure of the T
> isotope includes many electrons and positrons as proposed by P. Hatt and
> validated by high energy electron scattering experiments, analyzed by W.
> Stubbs.
>
>
>
> I assume he would call this duetrino fusion.  I would hope the temperature
> of a deutrino plasma would be high enough to avoid a run-away fusion
> reaction.
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
> *From: *Jones Beene <[email protected]>
> *Sent: *Sunday, December 22, 2019 6:42 AM
> *To: *vortex <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *[Vo]:Dense hydrogen may facilitate water splitting
>
>
>
> This water fuel development and another one similar to it - does not
> mention "dense hydrogen" - only efficient water splitting.
>
>
>
> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-13415-8
>
>
>
> This technique is claimed to be the most efficient electrolysis/
> water-splitting cell yet discovered.
>
>
>
> The catalyst used - a mix of iron oxide and nickel are both associated
> with dense hydrogen - either the Mills effect of the Holmlid effect.
>
>
>
> Thus, there is a decent chance that in addition to normal splitting water
> - this technique involves the densification of some of the H2 gas as it
> evolves. No attempt is made to collect it, of course, since the mainstream
> does not accept the findings of Mills or Holmlid, so using the output gas
> itself as secondary catalyst  or excess energy source - was not considered.
>
>
>
> Given the future importance of hydrogen - even migrating to a possible
> "hydrogen economy" in the future - additional catalysis or energy derived
> from utilizing dense hydrogen should be looked at closer (under the
> assumption that UDH is now only an incidental or unplanned part of the
> process and not optimized).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to