Jurg— Four questions that come to mind are:
* What is the distance in 3-D space between the D*-D* centers needed to start a common rotation of their respective flux rotations? * What matching is necessary of angular alignment of the axes of the respective flux rotation toruses, if any, to allow the common rotation and transition to a He* with the creation of new free space? * And does the new space volume (in 3-D) have any local time associated with flux rotation frequency or is there no local frequency of magnetic flux—i.e., no flux in the new space once the photon leaves the new space? * Is there any specific volume in 3-D associated with the new space? These questions may be good to consider at the workshop. Bob From: Jürg Wyttenbach<mailto:ju...@datamart.ch> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2020 2:42 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride I think Mills was accurate about self catalyzing of fractional hydrogen when trapped in a lattice, like cheerleaders forming a pyramid with the lattice as just the ground floor I suspect they can dilate out from the 3d base structure of the metal lattice and form blankets of fractional hydrogen in either temporal direction from the lattice. The restriction for Mills/hydrino like condensation is given by the symmetry of the fields and space. Orbits with same mass and topology can condensate what means start a common rotation what classically frees space-time what is equivalent to releasing energy. As said: In the Holmlid case we see such orbit pairing going downhill from 8 H* --> 2 4-He (8-Be) with a proton finally taking over the excess energy. This has nothing in common with Mills model as there always must be a final state with a higher stability/density = number of flux rotations. There is just one more rotation possible for one symmetric mass pair and thus there is only one H*-H* state fora a pair of protons where as D*-D* can have 4 bonds. Consequently the next H*-H* condensation only works if you have 2 H*-H* and does not work not for a single pair. This is what Mills missed. J.W. Am 07.02.20 um 16:54 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>: Fran— You seem to imply that nature changes depending on your observation position—at the center of a local hydrogen at 3rd base of a lattice nuclet or far away in the batter’s box. Is my inference correct? Also you suggest more than one temporal (time) direction. This suggests 3 or maybe 6 possible time directions relative to 3rd base—up, down, back front left or right. Can you explain temporal direction in more detail? Is there no global time that applies to all points in space, once that point is created? Bob Cook From: Roarty, Francis X<mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 10:37 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride Hi Jones, I still suspect Casimir geometry is actually relativistic and the math they are using is giving the dimensions from local hydrogen perspective while from our perspective the hydrogen inside the hydride dilates becoming both faster and “relatively” smaller, packing out further and further on the temporal axis while simultaneously getting harder and harder to detect from the macro world. I think Mills was accurate about self catalyzing of fractional hydrogen when trapped in a lattice, like cheerleaders forming a pyramid with the lattice as just the ground floor I suspect they can dilate out from the 3d base structure of the metal lattice and form blankets of fractional hydrogen in either temporal direction from the lattice. Fran From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net><mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2020 9:19 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride I was hoping that this new discovery would show much tighter hydrogen spacing - in keeping with the various theories for dense hydrogen. However, the spacing is far from pico and not extremely compact at all, and therefore this may result may not be related to LENR. Fortunately, there is a lot of work going on in superhydrides - and this work aligns with the long-held suspicion that a transient form of superconductivity at greater than room temperature - and the occurrence of LENR are somehow related. Here is a related paper on another superhydride with a massive 9:1 atomic ratio. Ratios of nine or ten to one are possible with high pressure. https://phys.org/news/2019-10-impossible-superconductor.html It is only a matter of time until a breakthrough occurs in this field and the extreme pressures now being used, become superfluous. Terry Blanton wrote: An international team of researchers has discovered the hydrogen atoms in a metal hydride material are much more tightly spaced than had been predicted for decades — a feature that could possibly facilitate superconductivity at or near room temperature and pressure. https://scitechdaily.com/room-temperature-superconductor-breakthrough-at-oak-ridge-national-laboratory/ -- Jürg Wyttenbach Bifangstr.22 8910 Affoltern a.A. 044 760 14 18 079 246 36 06
