Bob!
Let's do the neutrinos later .. we now can just smell them - at least we
believe it.
At least for the SO(4) fusion model we don't need them so far as all
energies can be explained without neutrinos - what was a surprise!
J.W.
Am 08.02.20 um 18:06 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com:
The consideration of the creation of new space with the release of EM
energy is a model that may explain the increase of entropy in
classical thermodynamic theory for closed systems with conservation of
total energy. ( However, neutrinos also need to be considered
assuming they have mass energy at their local space. They may be
like a photon in free space, but which are an odd magnetic flux
rotation—a fraction of 2pi radians-- .) 2pi/3 comes to mind as a
potential option for their odd rotation. That’s what it takes to make
any angular momentum.) 😊
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10
*From: *bobcook39...@hotmail.com <mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>
*Sent: *Saturday, February 8, 2020 8:32 AM
*To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject: *RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride
Jurg—
Four questions that come to mind are:
* What is the distance in 3-D space between the D*-D* centers needed
to start a common rotation of their respective flux rotations?
* What matching is necessary of angular alignment of the axes of the
respective flux rotation toruses, if any, to allow the common
rotation and transition to a He* with the creation of new free space?
* And does the new space volume (in 3-D) have any local time
associated with flux rotation frequency or is there no local
frequency of magnetic flux—i.e., no flux in the new space once the
photon leaves the new space?
* Is there any specific volume in 3-D associated with the new space?
These questions may be good to consider at the workshop.
Bob
*From: *Jürg Wyttenbach <mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>
*Sent: *Friday, February 7, 2020 2:42 PM
*To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject: *Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride
I think Mills was accurate about self catalyzing of fractional
hydrogen when trapped in a lattice, like cheerleaders forming a
pyramid with the lattice as just the ground floor I suspect they can
dilate out from the 3d base structure of the metal lattice and form
blankets of fractional hydrogen in either temporal direction from the
lattice.
The restriction for Mills/hydrino like condensation is given by the
symmetry of the fields and space. Orbits with same mass and topology
can condensate what means start a common rotation what classically
frees space-time what is equivalent to releasing energy.
As said: In the Holmlid case we see such orbit pairing going downhill
from 8 H* --> 2 4-He (8-Be) with a proton finally taking over the
excess energy. This has nothing in common with Mills model as there
always must be a final state with a higher stability/density = number
of flux rotations.
There is just one more rotation possible for one symmetric mass pair
and thus there is only one H*-H* state fora a pair of protons where as
D*-D* can have 4 bonds.
Consequently the next H*-H* condensation only works if you have 2
H*-H* and does not work not for a single pair. This is what Mills missed.
J.W.
Am 07.02.20 um 16:54 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com
<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>:
Fran—
You seem to imply that nature changes depending on your
observation position—at the center of a local hydrogen at 3^rd
base of a lattice nuclet or far away in the batter’s box. Is my
inference correct?
Also you suggest more than one temporal (time) direction. This
suggests 3 or maybe 6 possible time directions relative to 3^rd
base—up, down, back front left or right. Can you explain temporal
direction in more detail? Is there _no_global time that applies
to all points in space, once that point is created?
Bob Cook
*From: *Roarty, Francis X <mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>
*Sent: *Thursday, February 6, 2020 10:37 PM
*To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject: *RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride
Hi Jones, I still suspect Casimir geometry is actually
relativistic and the math they are using is giving the dimensions
from local hydrogen perspective while from our perspective the
hydrogen inside the hydride dilates becoming both faster and
“relatively” smaller, packing out further and further on the
temporal axis while simultaneously getting harder and harder to
detect from the macro world. I think Mills was accurate about self
catalyzing of fractional hydrogen when trapped in a lattice, like
cheerleaders forming a pyramid with the lattice as just the ground
floor I suspect they can dilate out from the 3d base structure of
the metal lattice and form blankets of fractional hydrogen in
either temporal direction from the lattice.
Fran
*From:* Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 04, 2020 9:19 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride
I was hoping that this new discovery would show much tighter
hydrogen spacing - in keeping with the various theories for dense
hydrogen.
However, the spacing is far from pico and not extremely compact at
all, and therefore this may result may not be related to LENR.
Fortunately, there is a lot of work going on in superhydrides -
and this work aligns with the long-held suspicion that a transient
form of superconductivity at greater than room temperature - and
the occurrence of LENR are somehow related.
Here is a related paper on another superhydride with a massive 9:1
atomic ratio. Ratios of nine or ten to one are possible with high
pressure.
https://phys.org/news/2019-10-impossible-superconductor.html
It is only a matter of time until a breakthrough occurs in this
field and the extreme pressures now being used, become superfluous.
Terry Blanton wrote:
*/An international team of researchers has discovered the hydrogen
atoms in a metal hydride material are much more tightly spaced
than had been predicted for decades — a feature that could
possibly facilitate superconductivity at or near room temperature
and pressure./*
https://scitechdaily.com/room-temperature-superconductor-breakthrough-at-oak-ridge-national-laboratory/
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
