I have often wondered about neutrino physics. Neutrinos carry a quanta of angular momentum and some energy whether in motion or apparently still with respect to an observer—a neutrino detector for example.. However the physics of the interaction is not defined very well. Empirical models do exist to allow prediction of Interactions with matter.
The characteristic of neutrinos not to not display any EM quality is somewhat mysterious. (They are thought to be primary particles that stand alone in nature., present a small rest mass and thus be attracted in a gravitational field. At times I consider neutrinos to be like a dimension of space or merely a circulating space volume quanta with a fixed circulating (time quanta). And at a Planck length scale. My comments suggest the need for some work on a physical model that that is validated by experimental observations! Bob Cook From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 7:30 AM To: firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission Robin== As you note a protective curtain makes directed energy beams impractical—birds would suffer as would moat any electronic equipment and/or energy absorbing medium that got into the beam. On second thought maybe a neutrino beam has been invented with special with new materials or fields to harvest neutrino kinetic energy. However such a device to collect neutrino energy would be useful as a solar neutrino collector like sunlight. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Robin<mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 12:42 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission In reply to Michael Foster's message of Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:13:13 +0000 (UTC): Hi, [snip] >I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that Mr. >Tesla is nowhere mentioned? There's a good reason for that. The two technologies have nothing in common. Tesla used the Earth as a capacitor so that everyone was "in" the capacitor, and attached to one of the plates. This company is using conventional wireless, but in a tight beam. > >This is important. No doubt everyone other than auto mechanics and people who >like the hear the vroom-vroom would like to switch to electric cars. The >problem is there doesn't seem to be enough copper wire to carry all the >current required to charge all the batteries in all the electric cars. Last >time I did some rough figuring, it seemed as if the maximum number of electric >cars would be about 10% of all vehicles before the power grid was over taxed. >Look at what happens when there are brown-outs on hot days. Those air >conditioners don't draw anywhere near the current required to charge a 100% >electric car fleet. I doubt mobile applications of this technology would be possible, if there were that many targets that had to be followed with a tight beam. Besides, the beam is dangerous. Worse than sitting in a microwave oven. That's why they talk about remote areas, and a laser curtain to detect intrusion into the beam. It wouldn't be suitable for use within an urban environment. It could however be used to transport power from a remote power plant to the top of a tall construction on the outskirts of a city, although it would be difficult to keep light aircraft from crossing the beam I should imagine. [snip]