Hi Bill and others—

Ideas on LENR theory:


HYPOTHIS:

1. Some/Most of the Ni powder were individual crystals of Ni which were a  QM 
(entangled) systems of  nucleons and atomic electrons coupled by a magnagentic 
"B"| field.

2. The QM systems of  my  first assumption could  be characterized by   
equations  (Hamiltonians) that characterize differing phases of the pertinent 
QM system.

3. Angular momentum  ands energy are conserved in the possible phases of any QM 
system.

4. Positrons, electrons and neutrinos make up the elementary  particles of the 
assumed QM systems  proposed in 1 above.  (A nucleon model proposed by William 
Stubbs is a key basis for  this assumption.)

5. H or H2 when added tp the Ni powder become part to the QM  system as an 
additional lattice nucleons(s).

6.  A fast LEMNR reaction involving a phonic increase in lattice  energy and 
angular momentum, an electron/positrons annihilations and a nuclear 
transmutation with lower, total    angular momentum and energy equal to the 
respective increases of the lattice electrons.

7.  Relatively slow cooling of the "hot" Ni  crystals follows per accepted 
theory.

NOTES:

1. AM is quantized at  in increments pf h/2-pi.
2 Magnetic moments are associated with the AM of primary particles.
3. Toradol shaped rotating  magnetic field may produce  what is commonly- 
called electric charge.  So(4) physics may be applicable to quantification.  ( 
Jurg may have better ideas about this.)

Bob Cook




Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

From: Bill Antoni<mailto:bantoni...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 1:18 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The "hero" LENR experiment ?

If hydrogen adsorbed on suitable catalysts can be made to desorb for example 
with UV light, and if then a transition of the H atoms to a compressed state in 
desorption also in turn causes the emission of UV light (without focus on any 
theory in particular, although R. Mills has studied such emissions with his 
Hydrinos) in a positive feedback loop, one such laser might be possible, but it 
all depends on how probable such transitions are. They are likely to be very 
rare with ordinary, untreated hydrogen-active metals (Ni, Pd, Pt, etc) or also 
more complex catalysts as used in commercial chemical reactors, causing them to 
go unnoticed most of the time. So, it's unknown whether such laser would be 
actually feasible in practice.

Although it will not work for a laser, with these mechanisms in mind, perhaps a 
reactor composed of a very long coiled tube with the active material coated on 
its internal walls could work more efficiently than a big chamber with loose 
powder, while still being in principle overall relatively simple to craft. The 
tube could be coiled around a heater of some sort, and tube geometry and gas 
admission would have to be such as to maximize repeated hydrogen contact with 
the catalyst coated on the internal walls (e.g. a straight tube might not work 
well and a free-flowing system could be better than one where hydrogen only 
very slowly diffuses through the material) instead of just absorption into the 
lattice as done in many gas-loaded LENR experiments.

I'm aware that one experiment by Mills or somebody else to verify his theories 
used a long nickel tube in an electrolytic cell, but that would be different 
than what I am thinking about here.

Cheers, BA
On 2021-11-22 19:54, Jones Beene wrote:
Hi Bill,

Your thought about "critical volume" is intriguing and brings up the 
possibility of efficient self-lasing due to adsorption/desorption and 
catalysis. Of interest would be the violet H line at 410 nm for which there is 
already a secret US Navy weapon in this category. Coincidence?

This could involve the possibility of a self-generating two-gas laser where one 
gas is hydrogen and the other is hydrogen in the collapsed state, formed in 
situ and making the device efficient due to a UV emission cascade. This might 
explain why a hemispherical reactor is useful (assuming reflectivity is 
enhanced)

In this regard, this old patent
https://patents.google.com/patent/US4159453A/en

and this article
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/lc/2008/839873/

seem to suggest that something like this possibility has been considered 
before... and might explain why the Thermacore project (with the Navy) was 
"apparently" canceled, despite the energy anomaly.

Probably worth a deeper look...


Bill Antoni wrote:

Jones Beene wrote:


One further thought about the Thermacore runaway - is there a potential lesson

there, for experiment design ?

There could be one lesson which can be called - GO BIG... but also BEWARE if

you go big.

Perhaps there is something akin to critical mass, which is important for

maximum gain, as in nuclear fission?

If there is a very small but non-zero chance for hydrogen to undergo certain 
transitions as it's adsorbed-desorbed from the catalyst material, then more 
than critical mass it could be a matter of critical volume of catalyst through 
which hydrogen travels before something occurs.

Perhaps that could explain why resonating systems are sometimes suggested to 
work well. They might be able to maximize hydrogen interaction events (defined 
as adsorption-desorption cycles) per unit of time with the catalyst.

Just a simple thought.
Cheers, BA



Reply via email to