A Bessler Wheel in the form of a toy.
Interestingly, Laithwaite came close to solving this with his gyro
demonstration at the RI.
May the strain be with you.

On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 at 23:00, Jonathan Berry <jonathanberry3...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Interesting idea.
>
> And while I don't think there are many things that could be introduced as
> a toy (Otis T. Carr's patent aside) ...
> Or maybe a perpetual motion toy, albeit if that was cheap enough to be for
> kids it would be a toy adults would want even more (executive toys).
>
> I think that images that manifested a tangible energy-like phenomena that
> kids could feel could appeal to at least some parents.
>
> Of course the designs will have to be less controversial that the top
> image which is a swastika (happily not just a Nazi thing and in no way
> resembles the Nazi version).
>
> Of course not all kids can feel the phenomena any more than all adults,
> but perhaps the percentage is higher as kids haven't been so heavily
> indoctrinated against such ideas yet.
>
> Maybe at any rate a book for kids and one for adults could be a way to go.
>
> Maybe a colouring book.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 at 09:08, Robin <mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> In reply to  Jonathan Berry's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2022 01:11:30 +1200:
>> Hi,
>> [snip]
>> >What would it take for a breakthrough in science?
>>
>> Most people are instinctively afraid of what they don't understand, so
>> they ignore it, and hope it will just go away.
>> This is especially true if acceptance implies upsetting their entire
>> world view.
>> Suggestion: Introduce it as a toy. Toys are something harmless given to
>> children to help them become accustomed to life
>> in the real world, so people automatically accept toys as harmless,
>> because that's what they have experienced all their
>> lives.
>> As long as the toy works, and is novel, everyone will want one, and
>> eventually mainstream science will get around to
>> investigating.
>>
>> >
>> >When I run through the scenarios it is pretty depressing!
>> >
>> >There are people who move manifest "Chi" type energy either with their
>> body
>> >or with technology (pyramids, orgone accumulators, orgonite).
>> >This cannot be discounted by science, but it can be ignored.
>> >My own coils and image designs have been felt by people who have had no
>> >knowledge (not placebo) but no one cares.
>> >And I have found which cup of 10 cups has the coil placed under it, but
>> no
>> >one cares.  Cannot be explained away but most on even this list won't
>> even
>> >give it a moment.
>> >
>> >So demonstration of a sensation that many (but not everyone) will feel
>> >isn't going to cut it, maybe if it was compellingly strong for 99%, but
>> not
>> >much less than that.
>> >
>> >So we also have many people who have demonstrated Free Energy,
>> Antigravity,
>> >"Cold fusion", and in the whole these cannot be fully debunked.
>> >However replication is spott at best (often it seems like winning lottery
>> >odds) and the true mechanisms aren't really understood (these two facts
>> are
>> >related of course).
>> >
>> >So bleeding edge indeed, technology mankind can reach to the stars with
>> is
>> >left to languish.
>> >
>> >These technologies aren't fitting in with the prefered models of science,
>> >they aren't favored by those with the money, they are at odds with
>> politics
>> >and are at odds almost philosophically with much of the world.
>> >
>> >So what will it take?
>> >
>> >If a device that produces an effect is expensive or difficult to
>> reproduce,
>> >too few will, even if those who do reproduce it are successful so what?
>> >And one or two poor effort reproductions that fail will throw cold water
>> on
>> >others who otherwise might.
>> >
>> >If a device provides an anomaly and needs exotic meters or such, again
>> that
>> >is going to lead to too few who verify it.
>> >
>> >Maybe if a device is really cheap and simple to reproduce and provides a
>> >readily observed clearly anomalous effect it could do something...
>> >But to be honest as long as there is neither a mass of interested people
>> >not interested people with money and or the right positions within
>> >physics...
>> >
>> >I am not really sure how humanity is going to advance!
>> >
>> >This doesn't just relate to my research, this relates to every possible
>> >technology Vortex was created to discuss or further.
>> >
>> >I am not trying to push my designs here, but if anyone wants to fight off
>> >incredulity (or is someone who has felt energy from my previous designs)
>> >then:
>> >
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/Aetheric_Engineering/comments/ty1j4f/latest_poll/
>> >Generally it is about 50% feel something, and again no one has been able
>> to
>> >explain away the multiple events that utterly disprove any conventional
>> >explanation.
>> >
>> >But be it my research or anything else, there is a massive barrier that
>> >except for making something useful obvious and cheap and easy to make. or
>> >some angel investor or lottery win...
>> >I just don't see anything changing!
>> >
>> >I get it when things aren't provable, but when they are how do so many
>> >ignore results?
>> >Then again, I see the same occurring with natural/alternative medicine
>> even
>> >when the success rates are high.
>> >Or indeed reasons to avoid vaccines that were rushed experimental novel
>> and
>> >based on the toxic part of the virus and has details they wanted secret
>> for
>> >75 years...  That still many took
>> >Or reasons to question how a building could fall at free fall
>> >speeds through still standing structure as though it offered the same
>> >structural resistance as air.
>> >
>> >And while there is no obvious solution to the alien/ufo subject that
>> makes
>> >coherent sense, when respected scientists consider the Fermi Paradox they
>> >generally utterly deny the absolute masses of evidence we have for aliens
>> >as though it doesn't even deserve a few seconds to discount.
>> >
>> >We have a seriously strange world if you choose to look at it
>> objectively.
>> >
>> >
>> >Jonathan
>> If no one clicked on ads companies would stop paying for them. :)
>>
>>

Reply via email to