Brown was not a fraud - but not shown to be correct either. He had support
from experts and his detractors were often part of the "nuclear establishment"
where billions were/are at stake.
As for the tech - NMR is used all the time in other fields and that technology
could be related to Brown's claims - and not too much of a stretch, since
nuclear interaction is at play. The target nuclei are already wildly unstable.
Larmor resonance could push some of them into decay - who knows? Maybe it is
time for a relook,
IOW the Brown claims may make sense on paper but proof or even a strong showing
- is lacking.
There was a marginally related unproved claim of radioactivity remediation (of
thorium) - which is essentially what the so-called "Cincinnati group" was
promoting - along with the same suspicious back story
... in the end... Follow the buck...
Chris Zell wrote:
Could someone explain the mystery of his radioactive battery was all about? ,,,
Standard physics insists there is no way, no how to any convenient triggering
of radioactive decay. Heat, shock, chemistry – whatever. Yet he claimed
otherwise through some sort of resonance.
So was Brown a fraud?
https://www.autoweek.com/news/a2114036/strange-life-and-stranger-death-paul-brown-case-another-smart-guy-doing-dumb-thing/
Terry Blanton wrote:
Paul envisioned his Nucell Resonant Nuclear Battery helping solve climate
change in 1989.
http://www.rexresearch.com/nucell/nucell.htm
CAUTION: This message was sent from outside the Nexstar organization. Please do
not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
