Re: Electrogravity From Accelerated B Fields

[Jones Beene]

Oops... Previous post went out too soon.   That interesting citation for the torus AG unit came from the electrogavity forum, mentioned previously by Colin.   In addtion to that there is a cross-post with reference to one of Fred's favorite laws...     The Biot-Savart law (Laplace-Ampere) states Magnetic Flux (measured in Tesla=Weber/area=Volt.time=Energy/Current) to be  dB=uoidL/(4Pi.r^2) from B=uo.qv/4Pi.r^2. The fine structure unification between the electromagnetic alpha=2Pi.k.e^2/hc  and the gravitational alpha 2Pi.Gm^2/hc then modifies this law as  B=Mw/2R.c^2. {Example: The earth's magnetic field approximates as 3x10^-5 Tesla (0.3 gauss) for a core-mantle differential rotation. Mcore=densitycore. Vcore~9x10^22 kg and Rcore~1.2x10^6 m and w=2Pi/86,400} Here M becomes  the unitised mass of the rotating system of angular velocity w and a displacement radius R. In the post below the rotation rate is said to be so 6500 cycles per minute and so w=2Pi.f~680 radians per second. The magnetic flux then is a function approximated by B~[3.8x10^-15]M/R). So B increases for a given radius with the gravitomagnetic mass in a selfinduction. Generally, a rotating cosmic body of mass M and spinrate w selfinduces a gravitomagnetic field in analogy to the laws of Maxwell, Faraday and Lenz in a form of B=Mw/2R.c^2." And this from another message: "So Biot-Savart transforms into B=Mw/2c^2.Ru and Ru some unification radius in concentric shells. So as example we compute the magnetic field for the earth. This formula predicts that this B will not only change with depth but to depend on the spinrates of the shells under consideration. We presume a core-mantle differentiation with equatorial radius of 6.4x10^6 metres migrating to a core radius of say 1.2x10^6 metres. As the density increases towards the earth's centre we set Core-Mass=Core-Density.Core-Volume of say 9x10^22 kg, reduced from the overall mass of so 6x10^24 kg as function of the density. The earth's w=2p/Period=2pf=2p/3600.24)~1/13,751 revolutions per second. Substituting gives Bearth as core-mantle differential (9x10^22)/{(13751)2c^2*1.2x10^6} or so 3x10^-5 Tesla. Since 1 Tesla=10,000 gauss, the measured average of 0.3 gauss is obtained by this encompassing formulation, subject to perturbation methods. The formula also works for other planets and also galaxies and clusters as function of their mass and rotation rates. For ionised media such as stars and say Jupiter and Neptune, Biot Savart is modified, as the charge substitution is related to emission/absorption of masses, such as plasma and the Solar Wind. The formula so is most applicable for nonionised media." The magnetic field of the earth is about half a gauss. Tony derives it using only spin rate, mass, and a radius differential which perhaps acounts for your "imbalances", uncovering deep relationship between moving mass and gravity, moving charge and magnetism.     All-in-all, this line of reaoning seems to be going somewhere - not sure where just yet   Jones