At 03:09 pm 08/04/2006 -0500, you wrote: > > >The conservation momentum is ideal as a perpetual erection. > >Science has gone a long way to conserve momentum...can science keep it up? >...should science keep it? > >Harry
Conservation Laws arise from the way things are defined. They are prescriptive not descriptive. Like accountant's books, the numbers always balance because they are made to balance. Ultimately, conservation laws must be reducible to a tautology. Frank
