In reply to  Frederick Sparber's message of Sun, 9 Apr 2006
14:59:10 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>The 240 volt 100 amp single phase service  (25 KW Peak) for residential use
>would limit you to
>1.0 pound of hydrogen (0.5 gallon gasoline equiv.) production per hour with
>a 2.5 volt 10,000 ampere state-of-the-art
>electrolysis cell. 

Actually I wouldn't consider an electrolysis cell meeting those
specs to be state of the art. It would require a huge, and thus
expensive, transformer. It is much simpler to just connect
individual cells in series until the overall voltage drop equals
the line voltage. Then connect the gas output from the cells in
parallel. The latter is easy to arrange by letting all the cells
share common manifolds (one for oxygen, and one for hydrogen).
Then one only needs a controlled bridge rectifier (quite cheap),
and a controller to drive it, and a compressor to pump the H2 into
the vehicle. No external storage is needed, because the unit can
simply be started after it's connected to the vehicle.
Because the production rate of H2 is so low, only a very small
(and thus cheap) pump would be needed.

All of this notwithstanding, I still prefer Jed's notion of
rechargeable hybrids as the best short term solution. It would
greatly extend the remaining amount of oil, and concurrently cut
the overall CO2 production rate (assuming nuclear or renewable
electricity production), to the point where nature could cope with
it again.
[snip]
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means.

Reply via email to