Jones Beene wrote: > > [Resend] > > Fred, > > It is probably a waste of time to continue to speculate on the Joe > Cell, given that it would be so very easy to demonstrate one > scientifically - IF - it were really a true energy anomaly. > Snip > > > "That concentric-cylinder set of "electrically floating" > > electrodes between the cathode and outer anode is a natural for > > Electrical Double Layer ZPE energy extraction and doing strange > > things (a Fermi sea tsunami?) to the argon that can slip down > > through the Liquid- SS metal interface when the cell sees > atmospheric pressure." > > Yes - if the Joe Cell is making either a longer-lived "molecular > muonium" or alternatively hydrinos - then very likely some argon > is involved in the process and it would be advantageous to add > more (probably). BTW - bet you didn't know that water alone can > concentrate argon from the 1% to about a 40/40/20 mix > (argon/oxygen/nitrogen). Here's some factoids from a previous > post: > > Factoids: > > Argon is the most common and cheapest of the noble gases (~1% of > air). The net quantity of argon in air has actually increased > since the Earth was formed because radioactive potassium turns > into argon as it decays - and not that much argon escapes into > space as it is less volatile than O2 or N2. Not only that, solar > neutrinos can convert the Cl in salt-water to argon. This is one > of the ways solar neutrinos are identified. > Argon-35 made by Chlorine-35 neutrino capture reverts to Cl-35 by EC in 1.77 seconds, the Cl-37 + neutrino ---> Ar-37---> Cl-37 in 35 days. > Snip > > > Again, until this device is proven otherwise, the best scenario > for why-and-how some older engines can run on the Joe Cell - even > a closed Joe cell is clear - they are being fueled by the oil in > the crankcase - and old engines with loose-rings will burn a lot > of oil - which is what is happening in most of the anecdotes. > How many miles/quart can you running an engine off the crankcase breather pipe, Jones? > > The only test I know of where an engine was taken-in for > semi-scientific exhaust monitoring showed the same level of > exhaust pollutants including CO, as any normal engine would even > thought the 'petrol' line was shut - > There is atmospheric CO2 going into the air intake, along with the possibility of Carbon from N2 or O2, Argon and after spending several hours reading Dyatlov's 112 page pdf, even helium-burning fusion sans gammas, with Negative Energy Vacuum sucking up the gammas and heat. >. > that to me is an indication > of the real modality in these anecdotes - oil burning. BTW this > test is available on video from an Aussie TV station but it was > not the Joe Cell per se - but a close cousin, perhaps inspired by > the same kind of trickster (or at worse : con-man) mentality. > The "Wizard of OZ" won't like that.
Sure looks like you might actually be an Energy Industry dis-information "Mole" Jones. :-) > Fred > > Jones >
