Robin,

If you consider the properties of severely shrunken hydrinos, you
will see that they have much in common with "orgone", including
coming from the sun, being "conducted" by various solids, and
possibly "turning radioactive" if "kept" too long.

Yes, but the fly in the ointment is that the cell reportedly turns cold during operation...

If one can suspend disbelief long enough - that problem can be rationalized by saying they [hydrini] are created in the "charging" process and not in the cell itself - and instead cool the cell when they are rejected by the much lower current there and by vacuum from the intake.

This actually fits into my belief about the thermodynamics of hydrino formation. I have always felt that making then is endothermic and the excess energy comes only when they are re-expanded back to ground state - and only then do they take that energy from ZPE. I am in a distinct minority on that - as Mills poo-poohs ZPE but nothing he has done in the Lab cannot be explained as well or better by ZPE than by his own theory.

Anyway as to the hydrino at higher energies, I posted some of the following to the HSG group but it never seemed to show up. The more I think about it - the more this seems like the best evidence in all of the literature for hydrini - unless I am misinterpreting it:
http://www.energystorm.us/_time_Resolved_Plasma_Spectroscopy_Of_Imploded_Gas_filled_Microballoons_The_Next_Generation_Final_Technical_Report_17_April_1995_30_September_1997-r128251.html

yes.. it involves a hot-dense plasma rather than a warm-thin plasma (typical of Mills) but it is actually very similar in density and energy to a layer in the Sun's corona where flares originate.

There are curious details - and there are a number of these
laser implosion papers in the online literature by researchers where deuterium and other gases are irradiated with lasers, presumably for purposes of obtaining data for ICF/Nova etc. Many of them result in a hot dense plasma with an average mass/energy of ~ 1keV per ion but with a massive bump in the spectra.

That "bump" is the problem as I see it. Two possible hydino inferences come from it.

The plasmas, in general, are much hotter with some argon (few percent) instead of all D2 or D2 and other gases. And Lo and behold: Recently Argon has turned up in solar flares - huge spike:
http://www.cbk.pan.wroc.pl/publications/2002/Praga_paper_htm.htm

Ar is claimed to be a strong hydrino catalyst, of course, and
spectrograph show pronounced peaks at what would be near the
maximum shrinkage level n=135.
27.2*135 = 3672 eV.

This is attributed by the authors of the first paper to the K-shell of Ar - as naturally it seems to fit there - but given the steepness of this
spectral region from the implosions, one wonders *why* the k-shell
was preferentially effected... unless it has something to do with
being an energy "hole" for the hydrino.

Perhaps protons actually "take" of steal a k-shell electron from Ar instead of it being ionized in the conventional way to form a hole that steals monatomic hydrogen. This may only happen at the extremes in energy - all the way to the k-shell - which even these flares are not hot enough to do without some help !!

...ERGO one can propose that the Mills' modality may fit into the
overall situation as a strong alternative to the conventional explanation, given the steepness of the peaks. If it were "just" the Argon k-shell being ionized then why the pronounced peak? Since the average energy of the plasma is only about 1/4 of the energy of these peaks - doesn't this beg the question of why the more tightly bound k-shell is ionized preferentially?

Obviously these researchers never heard of Mills or the hydrino,
so they assigned this energy level to what they knew best. Is
there more to the story ....?

Jones

Reply via email to