Appropraite for a Sunday-choice ... when in in Rome <g> or in the
Mall, if the movie-house in the Mall is your epistemological
choice for "breaking the code" ...
A new essay by Ken Shoulders entitled "Which Mass?" can be
downloaded from: www.svn.net/krscfs/
The key point is almost bibilical, and as heretical as DVC:
"This implies something so fundamental as charge and mass being
identically the same with the stated difference being only a
convenient definition conjured up by previous physicists and not
total reality."
Which Mass?
by Ken Shoulders ©2006
When confronted daily with the ability of an EVO to reduce both
expressed charge and mass and also faced with the incessant chant
or chorus of, E = mc2, one must ask the question of which mass
should we be concerned with as it slides over a range of at least
several billion.
The answer implied is that we must use one and only one single
particle to accurately apply the law. Still, considering the
incredible profusion of the effect of charge clustering, we should
know how to cover the questions this effect raises, as the energy
laws are supposedly too fundamental to lightly toss them about.
The intended outcome of such a quest is to devise new ways for
deriving useful energy from the mass variation effect associated
with EVO action. Although I have investigated several such means,
I strongly believe I have found neither all nor the best of them.
An allied mystery with the mass reduction effect is how the charge
tracks the mass reduction so accurately over such an enormous
range. At this point, this tracking is measured as having a range
of at least a billion to one. This implies something so
fundamental as charge and mass being identically the same with the
stated difference being only a convenient definition conjured up
by previous physicists and not total reality.
We are at the gateway of answering these fundamental questions but
I suspect any new answers will be drowned out by the orthodoxy of
the Church of Past Science. A consensus is not really needed here,
as mass will do what mass does, but it would be nice to at least
have a new agreement between vanguard science workers.
Which mass should we use as we move forward?
