Howdy Jones,
Mass can only be measured differentially, meaning it must be measured
against a mass. Since we do not know how to identiify the second mass we
remain in guess mode. Consider the exact meter length. There are several of
these " exact" samples each considered to be a perfect meter length. Well..
errr.. until the bunch are measured (differential) against each other ..
and.. well.. they differ... so which one perfect? We don't need to know. We
only need to know the difference which is what Shoulders said to start with
<grin>
Richard
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jones Beene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "vortex" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2006 9:36 AM
Subject: Which Mass?
Appropraite for a Sunday-choice ... when in in Rome <g> or in the Mall, if
the movie-house in the Mall is your epistemological choice for "breaking
the code" ...
A new essay by Ken Shoulders entitled "Which Mass?" can be downloaded
from: www.svn.net/krscfs/
The key point is almost bibilical, and as heretical as DVC:
"This implies something so fundamental as charge and mass being
identically the same with the stated difference being only a convenient
definition conjured up by previous physicists and not total reality."
Which Mass?
by Ken Shoulders ©2006
When confronted daily with the ability of an EVO to reduce both expressed
charge and mass and also faced with the incessant chant or chorus of, E =
mc2, one must ask the question of which mass should we be concerned with
as it slides over a range of at least several billion.
The answer implied is that we must use one and only one single particle to
accurately apply the law. Still, considering the incredible profusion of
the effect of charge clustering, we should know how to cover the
questions this effect raises, as the energy laws are supposedly too
fundamental to lightly toss them about.
The intended outcome of such a quest is to devise new ways for deriving
useful energy from the mass variation effect associated with EVO action.
Although I have investigated several such means, I strongly believe I
have found neither all nor the best of them.
An allied mystery with the mass reduction effect is how the charge tracks
the mass reduction so accurately over such an enormous range. At this
point, this tracking is measured as having a range of at least a billion
to one. This implies something so fundamental as charge and mass being
identically the same with the stated difference being only a convenient
definition conjured up by previous physicists and not total reality.
We are at the gateway of answering these fundamental questions but I
suspect any new answers will be drowned out by the orthodoxy of the
Church of Past Science. A consensus is not really needed here, as mass
will do what mass does, but it would be nice to at least have a new
agreement between vanguard science workers.
Which mass should we use as we move forward?
