Keith Nagel wrote: > Walter writes: >> We assume the impartiality of the experts. They don't lie; they're >> scientists! We believe them because theoretically at least we could get >> the same training and come to the same conclusions. That's what makes >> science different from theology. > > We assume the impartiality of the priests. They don't lie; they're > priests! We believe them because theoretically at least we could get > the same religious training and come to the same conclusions. That's what > makes > theology different from science. > > Walter also writes: >> I do have a little hope for one such demonstration sparked by this thread; >> see the new thread, >> http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg13665.html and >> particularly Michael Foster's post. > > Perhaps you should read the archives of this list. Better still, try the > experiment yourself, it's trivially easy to do, many of us have done it. > Then you can win the million dollars. Or not. > > Either way, now that we've turned science over to the priests and the > magicians > I don't hold much hope for advance. > > The Amazing K. >
If Galileo were alive today he would scoff at your troubles. Galileo had to face the priests of HIS religion to defend his science. Unlike Galileo, priests from your religion are not questioning your faith. Harry
