(corrected the subject line, of course the produced energy is equal to 
_lost_ enthalpy -dH, not to enthalpy change dH which is _gained_ enthalpy)

BTW there is another way to recover the ~572kJ found below: let's consider 
the reverse reaction, and pretend we don't know how much energy it absorbs:

2H2O(l) + E -> 2H2(g) + O2(g)

(dissociation of water, can be done e.g. by electrolysis, as all of us here 
know quite well :)

We know the electrolysis voltage threshold is 1.48 V, and we know that two 
electrons are transferred for each molecule of H2O dissociated. So for the 2 
moles of H2O in the reaction, the total charge q transferred is 2*(2*NA)*e 
where e is the electron charge 1.6*10^(-19) C and NA is the number of 
molecules per mole (Avogadro's number 6.02*10^23). So the total energy 
needed to dissociate 2 moles of water is:

E= V*q
 = 1.48*2*(2*NA)*e
 = 1.48 * 2 * (2 * 6.02 * (10^23)) * 1.6 * (10^-19)
 = 570 214.4 =~ 570 kJ =~572 kJ QED

hence the "=" sign which is being increasingly used instead of an arrow in 
chemical equations, e.g. in the CHEMIX software:

2H2(g) + O2(g) = 2H2O(l) + 571.6kJ

<=>

2H2O(l) + 571.6kJ = 2H2(g) + O2(g)

Hope this makes sense.

Michel

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Michel Jullian
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 12:38 PM
Subject: Produced energy is enthalpy change dH (was Re: Free Radical Chain 
Reactions)


Hi Robin, the NIST webbook, which I find much handier indeed than those CRC
handbooks, doesn't solve the controversy which is "is the energy produced in
a reaction equal to -dG or to -dH? (d=delta)"

BTW I just found that I was wrong in thinking that my trial version of
CHEMIX had expired, it seems it only counts down the days in which you
actually use the software, nice ! :)

So here is CHEMIX's thermochemistry answer for the reaction we discussed
(copy-paste):

2H2(g) + O2(g) = 2H2O(l) + 571.6kJ

which solves the controversy (produced energy is equal to -dH=572kJ/mol, not
to -dG=474kJ/mol), doesn't it Fred?   :)))

Michel

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Robin van Spaandonk
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 5:13 AM
Subject: Re: Free Radical Chain Reactions


In reply to  Michel Jullian's message of Sat, 3 Jun 2006 20:58:38
+0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>The spreadsheet did the dH algebra like it's own mentor told it, Fred.
>
>You could try downloading the trial version of CHEMIX (Google it) ans see 
>what their thermochemistry section gives for this reaction? Mine has 
>expired, and was in Norwegian or something for some reason (must have 
>missed the language option)
[snip]
You may both find this of use :)

http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/form-ser.html.en-us.en
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means. 


Reply via email to