----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

However, would it be helpful in the current context for me to provide a summary of the various (yes, there are more than one) water pre-treatment regimes proposed for the JC? The techniques are a tad more involved than Jones has previously suggested.

Patrick



Yes, Please do list those techniques in as much detail as you have available -as you are probably tuned-in to all of that wider range of input.

As for the pretreatment info posted yesterday, the input comes from a reliable source in Oz going back to the old Dingel forum, before the current hoopla. He appears in one of the current videos but does not want to be identified by name. He owns a Steven's cell, thinks orgone is bunkum, and probably wants to be a "player" in that business eventually. He claims to have invented the long-pretreatment technique and to use water-fuel daily with zero fossil fuel. He also claims to have been threatened and is fearful of even Stevens and has ceased posting to internet forums.

Conspiracy theories abound, making me suspicious that they are not just setting up a convenient kind of save-face excuse. I have encouraged him to write to Sterling Allan or do a public demo in Sydney with the Press or to write Robin, a vortexian who is keenly interested in all of this or to contact a university professor. However, methinks the threats are working - but that they are internecine - dollar-sign-denominated... they all know that there is something of great potential value to it, that nagging problems exist, that they are not there yet, but they all want a piece of some future action.

The proper water pretreatment may be the key to this, and may make it into a viable technology. But maybe the best use for it is as a booster - to improve gasoline mileage - and forget about the water-only possibility.

This is not to say that the "capacitor effect" - if that is indeed the operative modality, and cannot be achieved without the long pretreatment period - but only that the pretreatment seems to elevate a hit-or-miss technique into a robust technique. At least that is the claim.

Jones

Reply via email to