I begin to suspect these people do not grasp the fundamentals. Also, I get the uneasy feeling this is based on theory alone, without experimental proof.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to me:

Once the LN2 burns off the device STOPS! No perpetual motion machine here.

MY RESPONSE:

That is not what your FAQ states. It says:

". . . though the next generation systems will provide the energy required to generate liquid nitrogen directly from the unit."

That would make it a perpetual motion machine. The machine produces liquid nitrogen (LN), and the LN keeps the machine going, in a closed loop.

I do not understand advanced physics, but to be frank with you, I begin to wonder whether you understand basic physics, since you appear to have overlooked the fact that this describes a closed loop perpetual motion machine.

Perhaps you are implying that the machine is a heat engine that taps temperature difference between liquid nitrogen and the surrounding air, by "burning it off." If so, it is nothing more than a battery and because there is no economical way to make LN, this is not a useful or efficient battery. Obviously a heat engine of this nature cannot produce more LN than it takes to run the machine in the first place!

[And I hope that is obvious to these people . . .]

- Jed

Reply via email to