In reply to  Mike Carrell's message of Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:04:27
-0400:
Hi Mike,
[snip]
>> An alternative would be to use Tesla's method of pumping energy
>> into the Earth, and extracting it with tuned receivers. *No
>> transmission lines required*. Of course all power transmitters
>> would need to be owned by one entity, as there would otherwise be
>> no way of determining who should get paid.
>
>Tesla did not 'pump energy into the earth'. He had a large antenna atop his 
>Colorado transmitter and the idea was to pump energy into the cavity formed 
>by the earth and the conductive ionosphere. Reportedly he was able to light 
>a lamp at some distance without a wired connection. "Lamp" in this context 
>does not necessarily mean an incandescent lamp, which has low resistance, 
>but could be any of several versions of high frequency 'lamps' which Tesla 
>demonstrated at various times. Supposedly his backers withdrew support when 
>they realized that there would be no way to meter and charge for the power 
>drawn. Tesla's system would have generated enormous borad spectrum radio 
>noise which would have prevented the growth of AM radio broadcasting. The RF 
>energy desnity would currently be regarded as a health hazard.
>
>Mike Carrell

Tesla himself said that he did his utmost to *suppress* normal
radio transmission, as he considered this to be wasted energy.
The Colorado transmitter was in fact nothing more than a huge
spherical capacitor with a coil attached. It sat on a tower to
prevent arcing with the ground. The other end of the coil was
grounded. This "unit" formed one end of a tuned resonant
connection that ran through the ground (not the air), and was
connected to any other similarly tuned resonance at any distance.
The ground (not the Earth's ionosphere - Earth cavity) was the
energy transmission medium. It was a one "wire" transmission
system, with tuned circuits at both ends. Because it relied on
conduction through a real solid conductor it was nearly loss free
over large distances (just as the wires we currently use).

BTW I am probably the only person on the planet who believes this.
:)

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means.

Reply via email to