It had been my intention to see who would be the first to comment
on:
1) "Bucket of rainwater - ten cents"
... as being related to the high cost of everything these days, if
bought with nearly wothless warbucks ... but to clarify the point:
... here is the situation which could result in a substantial
true-cost for collecting "active" rainwater. This also relates to
a solution for retaining that (putative) solar-derived
hydrinohydride, which is supposedly available in rainwater, before
it can "disappear" into everything, including shingles, cistens,
bottles or whatever. After all, if we look at hydrinohydride as
lttle more than a very heavy electron, then it is obvious that it
will diffuse into everything, given time and no "disincentive". In
fact that is the very reason that this species can have gone
undetected by modern science.
The solution is a small negative charge, which must be active ab
initio, from the start to the end product (when the charged-water
is used in an ICE).
That's right. A negatively-charged roof (metal roof required),
charged-guttering, and charged-cistern, ect. will all probably be
necessary in order to keep these elusive hydrino-guys from going
anywhere, due to natural diffusion.
Almost any small negative charge will likely be effective - and
the 10 cents per bucketfull might suffice... although a kilowatt
applied during a rain storm might be on the low side for a large
roof ....
