(changed "hairy" to possibly even more appropriate "airy")
> What you do not understand is that we repealed Ohm's law here in > Georgia in 1966. Ah, that's why reactive currents don't heat up the wires there :) (sorry I couldn't "resist" ;-) More seriously, as you know from our private discussion I have found your counterarguments unconvincing, and I told you why, in particular a hypothetical unsaturated FET's VGS=5V plus Vcoil~19V does not add up to Vsupply=20VDC, whereas they _should_ because they are in series, whatever the emfs or back emfs contributing to Vcoil. I would appreciate if other electronics-literate Vorts, preferably less involved personally with the inventor, could examine and comment/criticize my objections. I would love to be proven wrong, really. Michel
