> Stephen wrote: > > This is a very strange statement. > > Why would it self-run for "3 hours"? Why would it not run until the > bearings wore out? Why would an observer who was not satisfied in 3 > hours have to remain unsatisfied (which is the implication here)? > > I'm sorry, I know this sounds like a nit, but an apparently arbitrary > time limit like that makes it sound like either (a) the message wasn't > serious or (b) _something_ runs down after 3 hours in which case the > claim of self-running is not quite right. [snip] > Again, I'm sorry to pick a nit this way, but if it uses a charged > capacitor to get it going, and if it stops after 3 hours (after which > the cap must be recharged?) it sounds like, well, there _is_ an outside > power source, after all. [snip] > Again, the claim was that it would self-run for 3 hours, not indefinitely. > > > If that still > > stands, it would make verifing his claims somewhat simpler... > > Only if it self-runs indefinitely.
OK, I picked a poor msg to illustrate my point. Try this one: ---quote--- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 08 10:39:32 2006 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 83346 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2006 17:39:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Apr 2006 17:39:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n27.bullet.scd.yahoo.com) (66.94.237.56) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2006 17:39:30 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys Received: from [66.218.69.4] by n27.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Apr 2006 17:39:29 -0000 Received: from [66.218.66.72] by t4.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Apr 2006 17:39:29 -0000 Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 17:39:27 -0000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose X-Originating-IP: 66.94.237.56 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0 X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 67.191.162.107 From: "metalspiderkiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Dave this is my last post X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=139802037; y=UZudDc0_k42Ov7bevz-_aq3wnFgP3k31fjKuVaZSzTJ6RmCIh1BOEWmsan8 X-Yahoo-Profile: metalspiderkiller Have you even seen my motor? Because your questions make no sense. There is no flywheel at all. What the hell is wrong with you. I will start with one charged cap 25V 5000uF that's all! The device will constantly produce far more than what the cap can store. We will light a 4 watt bulb for hours and hours. NO FLYWHEEL on earth that is started using that cap could produce 4 watts. Hell if you want we will use a drained cap and start EMILIE by hand to charge the cap. Then it will keep running on it's own producing 4 watts or more! Do you understand! I'll start it by hand just like a model A ford. NO OUTSIDE POWER SOURCE! It will run on it's own producing 4 watts or more for as long as to care to watch it. Last post from me, Paul Sprain ---ends--- -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/372 - Release Date: 21/06/2006
