BTW, for those not initiated in String Theory, the positrons
and Electrons are "Length Only" Loops or Disks with circumference
or Wavelength [2(Pi)R)] that can stack side-by-side and act like
a length-less solenoid.
Hence a nucleon has a radius but no width.
 
Something to do with "folding in ten dimensional space".
 
How wide is a photon, or for that matter any EM wave?  :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: Frederick Sparber
To: [email protected]
Sent: 6/29/2006 7:56:19 AM
Subject: [Vo]: Re; Nature's Particle Factories

A presumptuous thought?
 
Electrons and positrons (Leptons) making up a group 137 times their
combined 1.02 MeV mass-energy  is close to the mass-energy
of the Pi Meson (134.97 MeV).
IOW,  1.02E6 * 137 = 139.77 MeV.
Then, 1.02E6 * 4 * 137 = 559 MeV which is the unbound
mass-energy of a meson required to end up with a 312 MeV
"+/- Quark" in the proton(Baryon). (559 - 312 MeV) is the energy
given off as the binding energy of the two (+ or up ) and one (- or down)
"Quarks" in the proton.
OTOH, 1.02E6 * 8* 137 = 1.118 GeV which could
be the unbound mass-energy of a meson required to end up
with a 624 MeV (+/- Quark) in a heavy baryon "proton" (*P) which
would make it 2 times the energy-mass of a proton with same
charge and spin, but ~1/2 the nuclear magnetic moment,and
a different radius
 
IOW, there are groups consisting of 137 positrons and electrons
(Pi Mesons) making up heavier-stranger mesons that
 end up making Baryons.
Perhaps a garden variety of  stable "WIMPs" too.
 
Pulsars that are known to spew out megatons of Positrons and Electrons
every second can make the Leptons-Mesons-Baryons better than  the 
high energy physics laboratory "atom smashers".
 
The Proton-Proton to Helium burning  on the Sun could be working
with the heavier baryons (*P)  and donating them to the
Solar Wind as heavy (*H-) "hydrino hydride" or a low energy stripping (*D)
species. In a mass spectrometer *D containing a (*P) could look like mass 3
HD, He-3, or Tritium. Or with two (*P) it could look like D2 or He-4.  :-)
 
Fred

Reply via email to