I think the results of such experiments are evidence of absolute time since you can't get more non-local than absolute time.
Harry ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 30, 2006 9:16 pm Subject: [Vo]: Re: Bell, Bang and Entangle > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robin van Spaandonk > > Actually I don't even believe that information is transferred, let > alone energy. > > <><><><><> > > That is the claim of the "standard quantum physics" proponent. > > Let's try this: > > Creation of an particle anti-particle pair results in a dual > vortex in > the BCE which is separated by distance by propagation . . . sort > of an > hour glass with the top part going right to Scully and left to > Mulder > with opposite rotations in the BEC. > > However, since the spin is anti-evident, the direction of the > (opposing) vortices are not defined until someone with a timecone > (worldline) observes them. Filters them, wrt to the present universe. > > However (again), the spin vortices of the BEC remain indeterminate > until the observer's timecone intersects with particle timecone > (observation). This could result in a non-local flip which > correlates > Mulder and Scully's observations. :-) > > Because the timecones of the particles are interconnected in 'yarn > space', the spin, once observed, determines the rotation of the > particle vortex. > > Because all possible universes exist (based on observer's > descisions - > and this requires explanation), but the observer is traveling a > single > path, his timecone defines the spin polarization in his spacetime. > (assuming Susskinds 10^500 + universes) > > Seems trivial, n'est-ce pas? > > Terry > > (not even wrong, I'm sure) > >
