Jones, could it be some of the electrolysis gases gone into solution that recombined suddenly under the effect of the microwaves?
BTW what do you mean by "one watt per hour"? Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jones Beene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "vortex" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 4:39 PM Subject: [Vo]: BAM > Well, more like a big POOF. > > But it was an interesting first test of water from the > Emerilized-JoeCell. Kitchen electro-chemistry at its finest ! and > a bare-bones experiment costing essentially zero, but it will > certainly lead further. Perhaps some school-kid will develop this > to the limit (which, of course, would be the > microwave-lawn-mower). > > The electro-treated water after an overnight charge - with no more > than one watt per hour added to a half-liter of water - is > becoming moderately "active." Wonder if that will continue. An > eye-dropper full, placed in a shot-glass in the microwave gave me > quite a start when it exploded rather violently after only ~3 > seconds. Untreated water will also (sometimes) violently explode > like this (usually it just boils instead of flashes), but it takes > about 4-5 seconds of irradiation. Also tested 3% HOOH - and that > actually takes longer than tap water - not less time - to boil, > and it never flashes - so the speeding-up effect is apparently not > related to peroxide. > > Really meaningless experiment on one level - as this water will > not likely power an engine, and it will not "ignite" with a > match - as in the Oz videos, and there is no shock from touching > it. > > ... but OTOH this was a 10 hour pretreatment at only one watt > added per hour, and tommorrow morning it will be 34 hours, so we > will see if it gets more active. > > BTW Greg Watson has set up a Y! forum dedicated to hydronium. He > has some strange ideas on this, but I am reserving judgment until > he publishes his results. If treating water electrically (but > without full electrolysis) works to make it active - which cannot > happen according to mainstream science - then it will require some > 'outside-the-box' thinking. Greg Watson may be able to do that as > well as any of us. He mentions this gimmick-item today - > coincidentally (not sold by him): > > http://hiddencures.com/ionizer.htm > > Which has the identical "power supply" that I am using. Ha! Really > sophisticated folks ! In the USA these things are normally tossed > out in the garbage. Amazing what people will pay - if you add a > bogus health claim to something. > > BTW if you want to try this kind of kind of silly thing (or > supervise your inquisitive child/grandchild) - my "secret" cathode > is the needle from a hand-pump used for inflating basketballs. I > am trying to avoid any hydrogen gas being formed on the cathode, > so was looking for the minimum surface area - and also the needle > could possibly allow air to enter. Frank Grimer thinks that > nanobubbles could be "filled" with aether - not air, but either > way the needle seems to work. > > BAM - that was quite a flash actually. Makes me wish I had one of > those microwave powered lawn-mowers which we talked about a few > years ago - available to test with the longer-treated water > tommorrow... > > Funny how that half-baked idea never made it to prime-time. But > then again, they probably did not know about Emerilized-water ;-) > > Jones > >
