Wesley Bruce wrote:
Your overlooking the problem of patents. The patent will not be
allowed if the theory is disputed and it gets worse if there is no
theory at
Patents are intended to protect applications.
The discussion about the Steorm machine caused me to recall a patent for
a permanent magnetic mechanical motor. As I recall the patentee's names
were Jines, and Jines. My friend had plans to build a working prototype,
but AFAIK, he has yet to get the job done. The part of the mechanism
that involved shielding the magnet with Mu metal is similar.
I am mystified at the amount of bandwidth which has been expended over
this matter. I realize that if the principals are fraudulent then only
independent replication and testing will definitively answer the
question. However, IMHO, if the "motor" can power a device for an
extended period of time, that's a pretty good indication that it is
performing as promised.
OTOH, I recall a man who build a "F E" circuit which worked by microwave
radiation from a near by source.
--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --
http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
