|
----- Original Message -----
As for the MAHG I can't seem to find the group, if you can locate either
the post or the group that would be great.
It is a Yahoo Group: aH-gen
The archives are public, search for messages from
George Holz. Apologies to George, whose name I often misspell... as well as my
own on occasion. (the 'holtz in Helmholtz and others in science - is the
problem and my spell checker cannot remember that)
He ran a dummy load test which came to the correct figure, I find
it hard to believe that 20 COP times can become underunity, 10 times maybe
he's out by an order of magnitude somehow but I can't see how he can be that
far out so I'd love to see that post.
Basically it gets down to using a 5% duty factor
(reciprocal of 20, of course) and multiplying this by both the volts and amps
instead of only volts - (amps is an absolute value in this case) which fools
you into thinking that you are using 20 times less power than you are. The
mistake was picked up by others as well but Naudin never acknowledged
it.
It is not that simple, however, and there is the
possibility that there could be OU in the range of COP of 2.5 according to the
initial experiments, which were done correctly.
I talked to Moller personally (thanks to VOIP) -
and he is in denial, as well, about Naudin's gaff and his failure to rectify
that - or about the other egregious error in the write-up: mistaking cal for
Cal... This kind of error keeps getting repeated over and over... apparently
even by German PhDs <g>
... not that there's anything wrong with the
German higher educational system....
On 9/1/06, Jones
Beene wrote:
No, Naudin is not hoaxing - closer to needing a
lesson in measuring P-in.
Read George Holtz's post on the 20x power
measurement error made by Naudin. It is on the MAHG
forum.
|
