----- Original Message -----
From: FZNIDARSIC

> A new quantum theory must provide values for The Rydberg constant, the Intensity of harmonic motion,the intensity and position of the spectral lines. I have done this seven years ago, posted it on the web.  Nobody cares.

Well, if it's any consolation [and it seldom is] you are in good company; plus many readers do care, but ... hey ... who said that life was fair?
 
For instance, Gergor Mendel's important work did not achieve recogntion for 30 years.
 
However, if you are proven correct eventually - then it will have to come partly at Einstein's expense, no? It is a bit ironic that Einstein's most-cited article of all time is not the E=Mc^2 paper, but his 1935 paper with Podolsky and Rosen, which has over 2000 citations in peer-reviewed journals. The paper claims that QM can never offer a complete description of physical reality - now known as the EPR paradox.
 
Maybe you can prove otherwise and out-fox... err ... out-paradox EPR, but for the sake of just the PR part, it might help to find out who does Don King's hair... <g>.
 
A bit more seriously - part of the basic problem, historically, for many of the cases of 'delayed recognition' which have been studied, is pointed out in the last paragraph on page 488 of the above cite.
 
Jones

Reply via email to