Robin! I'm at a loss?
So you are saying that 'Carbon' has 0 {zero} background radiation? Like it
is at 0 K'
Why can not an object which radiates energy (we know all thing do) can not
be fed into an antenna, properly tuned and transmit energy?
Maybe your time is before the old carbon element phones where we turned a
crank to ring the phone of whom we were calling and often found that the
noise from the 'mouth piece' element was extreme an higher that our voice
signal?
-----Original Message-----
From: Robin van Spaandonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:48 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: 2nd law of thermodynamics is incorrect
In reply to Paul's message of Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:27:11 -0800
(PST):
Hi,
[snip]
>Lets simply. Neither experiment A or B have a power
>source except thermal noise. Experiment B radiates
>more power. It is a very simple circuit. Over time,
>more energy is leaving experiment B than experiment A.
>Therefore experiment B will be colder than experiment
>A.
Please forgive my ignorance, but I thought that thermal noise
occurred as a consequence of a current passing through a resistor.
A current driven by an external voltage. I didn't think that
resistors actually generated anything by themselves. Hence, I
wouldn't expect either experiment to radiate anything at all
(through the antenna).
(The only radiation I would expect would be normal thermal
radiation, from the body of the resistor, as a consequence of
their being at a specific temperature.)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means.
