----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:23 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Sprain motor
> On 11/29/06, Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Terry wrote: >> >> > ... others have confirmed >> > the measurements since your conjecture. >> >> Hi Terry, have the splendid overunity COPs you mentioned in recent posts >> been confirmed by the same expert who measured a COP of 0.25 on an earlier >> version? > > No. A potential licensee visited recently and brought his technical > advisor who had a BSEE and a PhD in physics. He first said that the > idea was "hogwash" and asked if he could perform his own measurements. > Of course, Paul consented. > > After several minutes of taking measurements, the good doktor placed > his finger on the electromagnet and found it cool. He then placed his > finger on the light bulb being used as a load and burned his finger. What's the implication of the temp difference? Anyway, the guy can have a BSEE and a PhD in physics and can still have made gross errors in his measurements, especially if he's had only a few minutes to perform them. What did he measure and with what instruments, and what was his conclusion? > Paul said the man had a moment of what appeared to be cognitive > dissonance; then, he went and whispered in the ear of the licensee. > At that point the licensee told the President of M Int'l that they > needed to go offsite and talk. > >> Didn't Sprain already think he had overunity when he bought that analysis in >> 2002 BTW? > > No. There have been 16 iterations of the Magmo. He did not claim OU > until the spring of this year. Ah? Then why did he spend money for that analysis, couldn't he measure the 0.25 COP himself at the time? Anyway Sprain's own recent measurements, which I saw in June of this year and which were supposed to support his OU claims, pointed to a COP of the same order as the 2002 value (well below unity) once I had corrected the current for the large error factor I found. > Just be patient. The new magnet is under construction. It is > segmented in such a way that the torque will be linear instead of > ramped sinusoidal as shown in the test you referenced. The sinusoidal > torque is due to the use of rectangular magnets. The simulations by > the magnet manufacturer show a near linear torque curve. Well, whether linear or sinusoidal, I view this device more and more as a perfectly ordinary electric motor so I won't hold my breath until it becomes overunity. However I can see you're an indefectible believer so I'll wish you the best of lucks :) Michel > > Terry >
