Mike Carrell wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "thomas malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 1:43 AM > Subject: Re: [Vo]: [Vo] LED cheap light > <snip> > >> >> The would, if they could. But I don't think that the second law is any >> danger from any dingus. Living systems OTOH, can reverse it, and there >> are reports that they do emit photons, perhaps someone knows more >> about this. > > Living systems do not reverse the second law, which strictly understood > refers to ***closed systems***. Living systems are not closed
Quote, "There are almost as many formulations of the second law as there have been discussions of it." --Philosopher / Physicist P.W. Bridgman, (1941) The reason there are so many interpretations is because it's one of the most erroneous laws of physics. It's kind of hilarious how some physicists continually append more rules to the 2nd law in attempts to duck tape and repair. Visually the 2nd law is not the size of the empire state building held together by duck tape. In this instance they find the need to falsely state living systems are not a close system. Why? Because living systems break the 2nd law. :-) Humans can be isolated. Fact is Humans have an appreciable free will, which can violate the 2nd law. Lets not waste any more time on the 2nd fictitious law of thermodynamics. :-) Regards, Paul Lowrance __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
