Harry Veeder wrote:
 > Paul wrote:
 >
 >> Harry Veeder wrote:
 >>> Paul,
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> I think what you are alluding to is more
correctly
 >> called "power"
 >>> rather than "energy". Indeed, "power" can be
 >> defined without the
 >>> concept of "energy".
 >>
 >> Hi Harry,
 >>
 >> The discussion was regarding PE.  So I was
referring
 >> to energy.
 >>
 >
 >
 > I know. Let be more frank.
 > If PE irrelevant to physics then so is the concept
of _energy_.


That's not the point.  I do not view fields as PE.  I
am pointing there are no hidden 
source of PE, that such PE is an illusion for the aid
of mathematic due to a flawed 
theory.  It's not math's fault, it's the theories
fault.

Consider four separated magnets (M1, M2, M3, M4) at
random distances. Present physics does 
not know where the energy comes from so they simply
say there is X1 PE between M1 & M2, X2 
PE between M1 & M3, X3 PE between M1 & M4, X4 PE
between M2 & M3, X5 PE between M2 & M4, 
X6 PE between M3 & M4. Such a theory is fine if that's
all you have, but I've simplified 
it and done away with PE.

For example, many centuries ago people did not
understand where the energy contained in 
compressed air came from. They could have easily
attributed it to a separate hidden energy 
storage compartment created and handled by nature,
called PE. We now know that's a silly 
idea because we understand exactly where the energy is
stored in compressed air.  Present 
physics just calls it PE.  There is no PE.

What if you create two iron atoms, each 1 micron
apart. How much PE is there.  How much PE 
between two iron atoms created at the ends of our
universe.  How much PE between two iron 
atoms created in different universes. Nature does not
need to know such silly things, 
because energy always exists, there's no hidden
undetectable backdoor of energy. Energy is 
simply moved from one source to another.

... I think if you go back and read my posts you'll
get the gist of the theory.




 > However, as I tried to explain, the concept of
_power_
 > is still relevant.

Yes, but we don't need to mention both power and
energy, as energy incorporates power over 
time.



Regards,
Paul Lowrance



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail 

Reply via email to