Please read the plea for help in this research at the bottom of this post.
Michel Jullian wrote:
> Paul the "how" question may be premature, the last I remember you had
convincingly shown that total magnetic field energy increased when two magnets
got attracted to each other, in addition to their kinetic energy increasing, but
couldn't the sum of these two energy increases be exactly equal to the energy
you must expend to separate them in the first place?
Michel, you are correct, as far as I know it requires the same energy to
separate the magnets. Actually it should require more energy to separate since
there's always some energy loss such as radiation.
Personally the idea of "getting something from nothing" has always been
unattractive. Therefore my research has always been about capturing ambient
temperature energy. IOW, atoms, electrons, molecules are moving and vibrating at
room temperature-- electron velocity ~1/200 c. The average temperature of our
planet is obviously sustained by the Sun. Therefore it's been my goal to capture
that ambient temperature energy.
I've simulated this far too many times in my head, which is one reason I'm
coding the simulation software. The idea is that a magnetic avalanche consists
of magnetic atoms rotating and precessing in a avalanche. Such a rotating
magnetic field of each rotating atom generates radiation. Nearly all of such
radiation is absorbed by the magnetic material. Such radiation causes the
magnetic material to heat up, which is first half of the MCE (Magnetocaloric
effect) process. When the applied field is removed the aligned magnetic moments
want to say in alignment, and therefore it requires energy to break the magnetic
moment alignments. It is known that magnetic materials near absolute zero
Kelvin stay aligned without any applied field. The reason the magnetic moments
in magnetic materials at room temperature break alignment is due to ambient
temperature. This removes energy from the magnetic materials ambient
temperature, which is why magnetic materials cool down when the applied field is
removed.
The idea is to capture enough of such radiation to overcome all losses while
providing enough energy to self-sustain the machine while providing useful
energy output.
The above is a vague description of my research and cannot possibly convey what
I've learned, as the technique of extracting this energy is very complex. A
researcher in this field will initially see interesting concepts such as
vibrating atoms have no rotation preference. Example, lets say the coil
influences more magnetic moments to rotate in a clockwise rotational direction
in the avalanches. Although there is a great deal of rotational friction in
common magnetic materials, you will note that vibrating atoms do no have a
rotational preference. IOW, consider a single atom that we'll call X. A
neighboring atom could influence a counter-clockwise rotational force on atom X.
Next, another neighboring atom could influence a clockwise rotational force on
atom X. The average rotational force on atom X is zero.
Such a researcher will also understand *saturated* magnetic material absorbs
appreciably less radiation. Another key note to such research is understanding
the magnetic entropy in magnetic material during various situations. For
example, a fully saturated magnetic toroid at absolute zero Kelvin has zero
internal magnetic entropy. Magnetic material at Curie temperature has close to
maximum internal magnetic entropy. The amount of magnetic entropy at say 300K
greatly varies from material to material. I theorize nanocrystalline and
amorphous magnetic materials possess relatively high magnetic entropy at room
temperatures. The idea is to influence maximum magnetic entropy followed by an
energy extraction technique. On many occasions I have attempted to mentally
simulate the MEG. Such mental simulations indicate the precise permanent magnet
within the MEG will greatly increase the magnetic entropy within the magnetic
material. Hopefully my simulation will confirm this and lead to an improved
design that will work on common silicon iron. One concern is that such energy
would mostly come from the inner core, which would cause rapid inner core
temperature changes. Such temperature changes would require a circuit that
adapts to such changes to maintain COP > 1.0.
That's an outline. What boggles my mind is physicists publicly ignore this
research. Why? It sure would be nice if other qualified physicists would
publicly contribute to this research. IMHO the evidence is as clear as day this
is a source of "free energy" obtainable with present technology. My only
purpose posting now a days is to gain help in this research. No offense
intended to cold fusion and ZPE research, but it boggles my mind why people
would continue such unknown territory when there's a guaranteed alternative. All
that's required is a strong fundamental understanding of electromagnetism, which
I could teach to even a child within a few weeks time. I am good at computer
programming and deep thinking, but my Calculus is somewhat rusty, which has
already delayed my research over two months.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
